Answer:
They had a terrible life
Explanation:
The reason why the natives were reallocated to the new spain is because they lost the conflict against the soldiers of the Spanish empire. The spaniards took their land away from them and force them to move away.
Even after they're reallocated in new spain, they still subjected to a really rough treatment. They are forced to work in labor camps and forced to abandon the culture/tradition that they held throughout their life. The spanish Empire wanted them to replace it with Spanish culture, language, and religion.
The correct answer is A. Internment camps and concentration camps
Explanation
The first quote can be inferred that it talks about the American internment camps by the author's name suggesting a Japanese origin Mary Tsukamoto. These camps were places where Japanese citizens were held from 1942 to 1946 in response to the Pearl Harbor attacks. These camps came to host about 120,000 people. These fields were built with high-security measures, with barbed wire, guarded by armed guards.
The second quote can be inferred that it talks about the Nazi concentration camps that existed in Europe because the author is of Jewish origin. The concentration camps were part of a policy imposed by Adolf Hitler as the main leader of German National Socialism. In these camps, people from minority communities such as gypsies and blacks were held, tortured, forced to work, and murdered. However, the main military targets were the Jews. According to the above, the correct answer is A. Internment camps and concentration camps
Answer:
Inca
Explanation:
Inca society was based on a strictly organized class structure. There were three broad classes: The Emperor and his immediate family, nobles, and commoners. Throughout Inca society, people who were “Inca by blood” – those whose families were originally from Cuzco – held higher status than non-Incas.
Mark this brainliest and follow and like
Answer: social exchange theory
Explanation:
Social exchange theory state that in the relationships we form with others we will always try to weigh the benefits versus the cost of that particular relationship.
Every relationship is a two way which means it is not about one person constantly giving whilst the other one is constantly receiving.
The give and take though is not always equal in all relationships that we have which is what this theory states that we may look at whether we are benefiting from that relationship more than it cost us then we can choose to stay and continue with that association.
If the cost is higher than the benefits it may not worth it to keep associating with that relationship.
Relationships that are worth holding unto are those which have benefits that are higher than the cost those are positive relationships but negative ones cost us more than they benefit us.