The answer you are looking for is a "compromise". Both sides will give something up so they are equal in the end giving them a compromise
<span>This speaker is guilty of "attack on a person".
Argumentum ad hominem is a argumentative technique whereby a contention is countered by assaulting the character, thought process, or other characteristic of the individual making the contention, or people related with the contention, instead of assaulting the substance of the contention itself.
</span>
Wdym man it is the people’s way of life?
Explanation:
The Tiananmen Square protests were student-led demonstrations calling for democracy, free speech and a free press in China. They were halted in a bloody crackdown, known as the Tiananmen Square Massacre, by the Chinese government on June 4 and 5, 1989.
Pro-democracy protesters, mostly students, initially marched through Beijing to Tiananmen Square following the death of Hu Yaobang. Hu, a former Communist Party leader, had worked to introduce democratic reform in China. In mourning Hu, the students called for a more open, democratic government. Eventually thousands of people joined the students in Tiananmen Square, with the protest’s numbers increasing to the tens of thousands by mid-May.
