I’m sure it’s B. Debit Card
Answer:
The disposal resulted was at D. No gain or loss
Explanation:
The gain or loss on disposal on a fixed asset is calculated by comparing the sales proceeds from disposing off the asset and the carrying value of the asset.
The carrying value of the asset is its net book value which is calculated as follows,
Carrying value = Cost - Accumulated depreciation
If the carrying value is equal to the sales proceeds from disposal, there is no gain or loss.
The carrying value of copy machine was = 45000 - 44000 = $1000
The sales proceeds were also $1000
Thus, gain/loss on disposal = 1000 - 1000 = $0
Thus, there was no gain or loss on disposal.
Answer:
Which pharmaceuticals company has decided to expand its vaccine business in the United Kingdom with an investment of £240 million?
answer= B.) Serum Institute of India
Answer:
bill of lading
Explanation:
Bill of lading is a legal document issue when goods are transferred from one place to another. It is issued by the freight carrier to the person who is shipping the goods. This document contains details such as which goods are shipped, quantity, details of destination. It also serves the purpose of shipment receipt, once the goods are delivered at mentioned destination in the document. To make sure that requisite goods has been correctly received the destination and shipped correctly from the shipper, the document is signed by authorized person from the receiver, the shipper, and the carrier.
The objective of such document is
- preventing theft of goods.
- Create transparency of transaction.
- Serves as a legal proof in case of any conflict.
Answer:
A. Jack cannot bring in the evidence of the oral agreement because of the Parol Evidence Rule.
Explanation:
The Parol Evidence rule is a rule in the Anglo-American common law that governs or determines the types or kinds of evidence that parties to a contract dispute can introduce when trying to determine the specific terms of a contract.
The rule also prevents introduction of further evidences by a party after a final written document or agreement has been reached. Things such as the content of oral discussions from earlier in the negotiation process, as evidence of a different intent as to the terms of the contract. The rule states that "extrinsic evidence is inadmissible to vary a written contract". The term " patrol" refers to "word of mouth" hence it is referred to oral pleadings in a court case.
Therefore from the question, Jack cannot bring in evidence of oral agreement into the court for evaluation because of Patrol Evidence Rule.
