The Declaration of Independence argues that people are "<span>endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights," and that the role of government is to protect those rights. When the government stops doing so, the people have a right to change their government.
A is wrong because the Declaration doesn't argue that raising taxes is wrong; it argues that the colonists' lack of any say in those taxes is wrong.
C is wrong because the Declaration doesn't mention not leaving office as a specific grievance.
D is wrong because the complaint in the Declaration isn't about the king not protecting rights; it's about the GOVERNMENT not protecting rights.
B is your best answer. The Declaration is very specific about this: "</span><span>To secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."</span>
Answer:
limited government is a government that has a document to put limits
grievance is a formal complaint
quartering is soldiers can take house or building
despotism is an absolute power in an oppressive way
The Sixth Amendment is the section of the Bill of Rights that states that any US citizen has a the right to:
1. Have a speedy trail.
2. A fair jury.
3. An attorney (hired by the citizen or provided by court)
4. A chance to confront the witness.
5. Obtain witnesses in their favor.
The points mention above are more specific on the Sixth Amendment. What the woman in the scenario has the right to is to obtain witnesses in her favor, by doing so her friends are force by law to attend court by the use of summons. Leaving them with no choice but to testify.
Answer:What was life like under the Safavids? Life was a mixed society of Turkish and Persian elements. Shia Islam was the state religion and Shahs were more available to their subjects than rulers elsewhere. There was active trade and manufacturing activity with Bazaars being the heart of commerce.
Explanation: That's was an easy one :)