Answer:
hope this helps!
Explanation:
Athenian democracy developed around the 6th century BC in the Greek city-state (known as a polis) of Athens, comprising the city of Athens and the surrounding territory of Attica. Although Athens is the most famous ancient Greek democratic city-state, it was not the only one, nor was it the first; multiple other city-states adopted similar democratic constitutions before Athens.Ober (2015) argues that by the late 4th century BC as many as half of the over one thousand existing Greek city-states might have been democracies.
Athens practiced a political system of legislation and executive bills. Participation was open to adult, male citizens (i.e., not a foreign resident, regardless of how many generations of the family had lived in the city, nor a slave, nor a woman), who "were probably no more than 30 percent of the total adult population".
Solon (in 594 BC), Cleisthenes (in 508–07 BC), and Ephialtes (in 462 BC) contributed to the development of Athenian democracy. Cleisthenes broke up the unlimited power of the nobility by organizing citizens into ten groups based on where they lived, rather than on their wealth. The longest-lasting democratic leader was Pericles. After his death, Athenian democracy was twice briefly interrupted by oligarchic revolutions towards the end of the Peloponnesian War. It was modified somewhat after it was restored under Eucleides; the most detailed accounts of the system are of this fourth-century modification, rather than the Periclean system. Democracy was suppressed by the Macedonians in 322 BC. The Athenian institutions were later revived, but how close they were to a real democracy is debatable.
Answer:
The answer is D.
Explanation:
Maps and globes usually have lines on them to help locate places on Earth. These lines are called latitude and longitude lines. These lines are not actually on the planet, but are imaginary lines used to help us find our way around the curved surface of Earth. Lines of latitude and longitude crisscross to form a grid. Hope this helps :).
I think it is the last one, because revolutions are connected with the need for better treatment and living conditions.
To understand what Federalists and Anti-Federalists are, you first have to understand the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was the first constitution of the United States, this was created because the colonists felt like they needed a formal government. Although the Articles of Confederation did some good in some ways, it was a very bad article that gave little to no power to the federal government. This meant that the government could not tax the people, they had to ask states for the money, this made it so they could not pay debts or pay for wars. The Articles of Confederation also made it so the government could not enforce any laws, which obviously leads to people taking advantage of the system and doing crime for their own benefit. After awhile, people began to grow sick of this, and wanted a new constitution which gave power to the federal government. This is where Federalists and Anti-Federalists come along. Federalists, wanted a new constitution for the United States, and they felt the Articles of Confederation was too weak. Anti-Federalists, opposed a new constitution for the United States, they were scared if too much power fell into the federal government's hands, the same thing would happen with what happened with Great Britain, and would fall succumb to "taxation without representation", or other unfair occurrences. The Federalists were not supported by Anti-Federalists or any other group that did not want to altar or make a new constitution for the United States.
I believe the correct answer is the northeast.
hope i could help :)
