Answer:
If your options are:
A. The poem uses variations of meter to affect rhyme.
B. The poem’s sentences flow across stanzas.
C. The poem’s stanzas have varying lengths.
D. The poem uses nontraditional syntax and rhyme scheme.
Then the answer is D.
Explanation:
The nontraditional syntax is best shown in the use of enjambment - interrupting the thought and syntactic structure in the middle and moving the rest to the next line. For example: "and older than the // flow of human blood (...)"
Here, the definite article "the" has been separated from the noun "flow", which means the phrase is visually broken in half.
- A isn't true because this poem conveys its meaning through rhythm and not rhyme. There are virtually no rhymes here and the syntax (sentence structure) is disrupted, invoking the sound of a river flowing in irregular but consistent waves.
- B isn't true because the sentences do flow across lines but not across stanzas.
- The stanzas do have varying lengths. But even though this element was pretty rare prior to the 20th century, it is not exclusive to modernist poetry. That's why C isn't true either.
I believe that the information your organizational system should document is D. all of these - bibliographic information for all sources used, research information in its various forms, author, title of the piece, and publisher.
All of these are very important details that need to be documented so as to avoid plagiarism.
Answer:
by memorizing parts of the script so that he can make eye contact with the audience more often.
An effective presenter should know his material well enough to look up and make eye contact with his audience.
Explanation:
A
Explanation: This prohibits the government from harsh penalties
Answer:
He questions the tradition of wall-mending.
Explanation:
