All categories

2 years ago

Can policy market interventions cause consumer or producer surplus.

Business

1 answer:

kifflom [539]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

What government interventions cause consumer or producer surplus?

There are two main economic effects of a tax: a fall in the quantity traded and a diversion of revenue to the government. A tax causes consumer surplus and producer surplus (profit) to fall..

Explanation:

its a tax

You might be interested in

7. List and explain 3 things that make you enthusiastic about learning?

Reptile [31]

Answer:

1) Reward

2) Enjoyment

3) Personality Growth

Explanation:

Learning Business

I opted for Business because it is very easy as compared to other subjects.

It is applicable anywhere anytime.

It is rewarding in terms of rules and regulations.

Otherwise Learning

It enhances your abilities making you a strong enough person to fight any challenge.

It is always rewarding. It pays you one way or other.

It polishes and nourishes your personality to an extent where you feel better adapted towards life.

It is an enjoyment in the sense that it makes you see how well you use your abilities. For example I like mathematics and I enjoy doing it. Some people like drawing and they enjoy it.

4 0

2 years ago

Losing a customer once means losing the entire stream of possible purchases that the customer would make over an extended period

sdas [7]

Answer: (D) Customer lifetime value

Explanation:

The customer lifetime value is the term, which refers to the overall profit of an organization and this type of method also helps in estimating the customer monetary in the business.

The customer lifetime value is basically using the predictive analytical method for analyzing the relationship with the consumers.

The customer lifetime value is refers to the metric of net profit in an organization and it also helps in making various types of decision in an organization in terms of development, marketing and the customer support.

Therefore, Option (D) is correct answer.

5 0

3 years ago

Torrey Co. manufactures equipment that is sold or leased. On December 31, 2021, Torrey leased equipment to Dalton for a five-yea

topjm [15]

Answer:

$850,000

Explanation:

The computation of Amount of income should Torrey realize from the lease transaction is shown below:-

Amount of income should Torrey realize from the lease transaction = Sale price - Cost

= $3,850,000 - $3,000,000

= $850,000

Therefore for computing the amount of income should Torrey realize from the lease transaction we simply deduct the cost from sales price.

5 0

3 years ago

Why is it important for boolean expressions to be minimized in the design of digital circuits?

VladimirAG [237]

1.to make circuit to be smaller hence less number of logic gate.

2.reduces propagation.

4 0

3 years ago

You are a self-employed profit-maximizing consultant specializing in monoplies. Five single-price, profit-maximizing monopolies

inna [77]

Answer:

Firm A

Firm A is charging a cost of $3.90 for every unit. The normal expense is the all out cost separated by amount which ends up being $3.70 per unit. Presently its minor income is $3.00 per unit and negligible expense is $2.90 per unit. The imposing business model firm can't create enough yield in light of the fact that the minor income surpasses the minimal expense.

Consequently, Firm A is encouraged to expand its yield. This will bring increasingly net income and get it a higher benefit. The yield should increment till minimal income and negligible expense gets equivalent.

Firm B

Firm B is charging a cost of $5.90 for every unit. The normal expense is $4.74 per unit. Presently its peripheral expense is $5.90 per unit. Note that the syndication firm is charging a value which is equivalent to the negligible expense. Consequently, it is carrying on seriously. by delivering more and charging less.

Consequently, Firm An is encouraged to diminish its yield. This will expand cost more than the expansion in cost with the goal that it acquires a higher benefit. The yield should diminish till minimal income and minor expense gets equivalent.

Firm C

Firm C is charging a cost of $11.00 for every unit. The normal expense is the all out expense is $11.90 per unit. Minimal income is $9.00 per unit and minor expense is $9.00 per unit. The imposing business model firm is delivering a benefit expanding yield on the grounds that the minor income rises to the peripheral expense. Nonetheless, it is bearing misfortunes since normal expense is higher than cost.

Thus, Firm C is encouraged to stay at the present degree of yield. It can close down over the long haul if misfortunes keep on happening. This is on the grounds that it can't increment or diminishing its yield as it will just alumni the misfortunes.

Firm D

Firm D is charging a cost of $35.90 for every unit. The normal expense is additionally 35.90 per unit. The minor income is $37.90 per unit and negligible expense is $37.90 per unit. The imposing business model firm is creating a benefit amplifying yield on the grounds that the minor income approaches the peripheral expense. Strangely, its cost is not as much as its negligible income which is beyond the realm of imagination.

Thus, Firm D has fouled up estimations with respect to its cost. Thoughtfully, the cost ought to consistently be higher than the minimal income or at most extreme it tends to be equivalent to minor income. It ought to return and recalculate the cost.

Firm E

The information identified with the minor income and minimal expense for Firm E isn't given. The cost charged is $35.00 per unit. The normal expense is at its base level and is equivalent to $33.00 per unit. This data isn't adequate to distinguish if the firm is working at a benefit boosting level.

Therefore, Firm E is encouraged to stay at the present degree of yield.

6 0

3 years ago