A past-tense verb, meaning it already happened. If it was a present-verb, it would be build.
Answer:
<u>о Have you ever noticed that many great conversationalists do not talk as much as they listen?</u>
<u>о If you are really interested in gaining energy, you must vigorously spend what you have.</u>
<u>о History is a subject about the past.</u>
<u>о Our school closes during snowstorms.</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
A well-written topic sentence should easily inform readers what the other paragraph of a sentence is about.
Hence, we could notice that each of those sentences gives the reader insight into what to expect from the other paragraph.
For example, the one that says, "<em>History is a subject about the past," </em>tells the reader to expect other sentences in the paragraph would be to supportive of this claim.
Indeed. It is a complete sentence, since there is no slang or incorrect grammar in this sentence.
Yes.
it is not possible under current U.S. law to copyright or protect an idea. (You also cannot copyright a title.) So, how much precaution should you take to keep your ideas secret?
Very little. I guarantee that others have similar ideas; you see it happen all the time in the business. Chalk it up to cultural zeitgeist. While I don’t advocate advertising your idea far and yon, or putting flashing lights around it on your blog, the chances that an agent, editor, critique partner, or stranger will:
(a) steal your idea
(b) execute your idea better than you
(c) AND be able to sell it
… are next to zero. It is not worth worrying about. Share your work with trusted advisers, send it to agents/editors for consideration, and talk about aspects of it on your blog. No problem. Unless you are known in the industry for coming up with million-dollar high concepts, it’s not likely you’ll experience idea theft.
Also, I love Jeanne Bowerman‘s take on this fear: Sure, someone can steal your idea, but they can’t possibly execute it or interpret it in the same way you can. No one can be you. That is your best protection of all.
Answer:
Yeah I think they were effective because they got to know them better.
Please mark brainliest
