It relied most heavily on the Character element of
literature. Of you have noticed, this book was written through the narrator’s
point of view. This is regarding all his experiences which in the end points
out the message of the author. It used the person or the main character itself
to portray all his life experiences.
Jack Hanna is in favor of raising animals in zoos and aquariums, contrary to the opinion of Dr. Jane Goodall who believes they should be released into the wild.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Jack Hanna says he admires Dr. Jane Goodall's stance and her ability to change her mind when she recognizes that she is wrong.
- But he disagrees with her position in advocating that animals raised in captivity, in aquariums, and zoos be released into the wild.
That's because, for him, these animals have resources that they would not find in nature, in addition to living in safety and away from the dangers that wildlife offers.
More information about Dr. Jane Goodall at:
brainly.com/question/8122584
Answer:
It limits the readers knowledge of other characters.
Explanation:
As opposed to third person omniscient, which consists of an "all-knowing" narrator, third-person-limited point of view only allows the reader to know what the main character is doing. The main character's thoughts may be mentioned, but the reader is not privy to the other character's thoughts, or even their actions when they are not with the main character.
Answer:
da person who tells da story & da naraators feelins
Explanation:
