Answer:
try and think of something
the right answer is: that educating adolescents about how to make better choices to avoid the consequences of risky behaviors does not reduce the number of risky behaviors committed by adolescents.
Because according to studies on the peer influence of adolescents and decision making says that moving past research center investigations of age contrasts in "cool" psychological procedures identified with hazard discernment and thinking, new methodologies have moved concentration to the impact of social and enthusiastic factors on immature neurocognition. When teenagers invest an expanding measure of energy with their companions, explore recommends that peer-related boosts may sharpen the reward framework to react to the reward estimation of dangerous conduct. As the intellectual control framework step by step develops through the span of the high school years, teenagers develop in their ability to facilitate influence and insight, and to practice self-direction even insincerely stimulating circumstances. These limits are reflected in progressive development in the ability to oppose peer impact.
Answer:
The red ball is used in test matches while the white ball is used in T20 and ODI. I think this is cricket right?
Explanation:
I believe the answer is: Known-groups paradigm
A study is considered to have Known-groups paradigm if the researchers understand that the measure that they take will discriminate a certain groujp of subjects because of their known behavior.
From the case above Dr. Sheffield create a test to determine whether the subject unable to resist impulses to gamble.
The subjects that he use is <u>a group of ex-gamblers</u> who acknowledge they have a gambling problem (gamblers anonymous) and a group of ex-alcoholic who acknowledge they have drinking problem (AA). We can say with high certainty that dr. Sheffield <u>knew really well that people on GA will have higher scores.</u> He just want to how big is the difference compared to the scores from AA group.
