All categories

2 years ago

Why do malleable and ductile physical properties help make minerals useful? Pls answer with a simple/easy to understand answer

Biology

1 answer:

vodomira [7]2 years ago

7 0

Answer:

Malleable and ductile properties indeed help minerals useful. Both properties are useful because they help in transforming the shapes of minerals. Malleability is a useful property since it can be flattened or pounded by a hammer. Also, the ductile property makes it possible for the minerals to be stretched in the form of a wire. These two properties makes it useful for minerals.

Explanation:

Malleable and ductile properties indeed help minerals useful.

Both properties help in transforming the shapes of minerals.

Malleability is a useful property since it can be flattened or pounded by a hammer.

The ductile property makes it possible for the minerals to be stretched in the form of a wire.

You might be interested in

What is the role of pH in the maintenance of DNA inside a nucleus? How can pH be disrupted?

inysia [295]

Answer:

heyooooo!!!!!!

Hydrogen ions play a central role in the lives of cells. For example, changes in hydrogen ion concentration are intimately tied to the charge of side chains in proteins. This charge state, in turn, affects the activity of enzymes as well as their folding and even localization. Further, the famed ATP synthases that churn out the ATPs that power many cellular processes are driven by gradients in hydrogen ions across membranes.

hope this helps!!

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago

What do the bullhorn acacia<br> trees get from the acacia<br> ants?

ratelena [41]

Answer:

The plants provide food and accommodation in the form of food bodies and nectar as well as hollow thorns which can be used as nests. The ants return this favor by protecting the plants against herbivores

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

glucose levels go up in the bloodstream after a meal. beta cells of the pancreas detect the elevated glucose levels. this causes

Keith_Richards [23]

The secretion of insulin into the bloodstream is done through exocytosis and absorption through the capillary arteries.

Insulin is a protein required to process sugar. This is a <u>naturally produced protein</u> for which the pancreas is responsible. The insulin Protein is considered a transport protein. It is responsible for carrying glucose from the bloodstream into cells to be used as energy.

This protein is of vital importance. The secretion of this protein is done through exocytosis, which means that after passing through the ribosomes and the Golgi, it is contained within a membrane, which will then fuse into the plasmatic membrane and be released from the cell. It is then absorbed through the capillaries to enter the bloodstream.

To learn more:

brainly.com/question/6658031?referrer=searchResults

4 0

2 years ago

Provide an adaptive and a nonadaptive hypothesis for the evolutionary loss of useless organs, such as eyes in many cave-dwelling

Zepler [3.9K]

In order to be able to Provide an adaptive and a non-adaptive hypothesis, the following is required

<h3>What is adaptation?</h3>

It refers to a trait or an integrated set of traits that increases the fitness of an organism. It is the process of improving the fit of phenotype to environment through natural selection.

<h3>What is non adaptation?</h3>

it refers to those traits that do not result in the better adaptation of the organism to its environment, and does not increase the genetic fitness of the organism.

Let us take the case of vain organs. There may be a metabolic value to constructing a vain organ, and subsequently the humans who have misplaced that organ might also have a selective advantage. Also, if the organ is useless, the mutations that disrupt the improvement of that organ would be evolutionarily neutral, and may want to unfold to fixation via genetic drift.

So an adaptive hypothesis as to why an organism may lose useless organs is energy trade offs. The organism may additionally be losing energy in growing and retaining a vain organ, whilst this strength can be higher used someplace else. So an organism that lives in a darkish cave might also sooner or later lose its eyes considering eyes are of no use inside a darkish cave.

A non adaptive hypothesis for the evolutionary loss of organs can be random mutation. If a random mutation occurs that causes an organism to lose its eyes, in a dark cave where it does not use its eyes anyway, it could still survive, reproduce and pass that mutation down.

For more information on adaptive hypothesis, visit

brainly.com/question/975242

3 0

3 years ago

Which event during fertilization leads to the acrosome reaction?

Artemon [7]

<span>The release of the sperm in the vagina</span>

8 0

3 years ago