Answer: The answer is No, because the MB > MC
Explanation:
They are not cleaning up enough because the MB>MC. Therefore, all other options which cut across - Yes, because the MC > MB,
No, because the MB > MC,
Yes, because the MB > MC and
No, because the MC > MB are wrong.
Answer: 52.51 rupees/dollar
Explanation:
The real exchange rate attempts to account inflation in the countries being compared by using prices in the exchange rate.
The formula for calculating it is;
Real exchange rate = Nominal exchange rate *(Price index of domestic country/Price index of foreign country)
Real exchange rate in 2014 = 57*(99.5/108)
= 52.51 rupees/dollar
Answer: C. 0.3
Explanation: The Acceptable Macronutrient Distribution Range (AMDR) usually expressed as percentage of total daily intake of energy is defined as the range of intakes for a particular energy source (protein, fat, carbohydrate etc) that is associated with reduced risk of chronic disease while providing adequate intakes of essential nutrients required by the body. For proteins this is within the range of 10 to 35%, expressed as fraction, 0.1 to 0.35. Option C falls within this range and therefore is the correct answer.
Answer:
Check the explanation
Explanation:
a)
In IFRS according to IAS 19 all past service cost is recognized in the net income in the period in which amendment (change) is made by entity for defined benefit pension, it does not matter what is the status of the employees who will benefit the change. So in Year 1 $150000 will be expended completely and in subsequent years the amount is $0
Year 1 =$150000
Subsequent years= $0
b) In US GAAP the past service cost is recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income in the year of amendment. It is amortized over the future working life of the participants.
Year 1 is year of adoption hence $0 is amortized because $150000 is included in Accumulated other comprehensive income.
Subsequent years: (150000/10=15000) $15000 will be amortized for each year for 10 years.
Answer:
Option B
Explanation:
In simple words, under such tax reforms the government is intending to raise indirect taxes which will lead to higher prices of certain goods and is also declining taxes on savings. Both of these steps will work as an incentive for individuals to save more.
However a big majority of community is stating that this will only lead to more burden on the weaker section due to higher prices of commodities and will eventually result in lower standard of living for certain individuals.