Answer:
0.4 swiss good(s) per U.S good(s)
Explanation:
firstly we calculate how many dollars we get per Frank so we will say $1/ 5 Swiss Franks =$0.2 which is similar to (5x =1, solve for x =1/5 / 0.2 in simple maths )per Swiss Franc thereafter we calculate the how many Swiss Francs per good compared to dollars per good we can get so therefore 2 Swiss Francs per good/$1 per good is the ratio of comparison , hence we treat f(X) as a function of swiss good(s) per U.S good, therefore f(X)= 2 x , knowing that x= 0.2 f(x)= 2(0.2) which will result in f(x)= 0.4.
Answer:
ADJUSTED BOOK BALANCE
Bank balance $59,549 Book balance $61,709
+ Deposit in transit $4,250 Interest earned $33
- Outstanding checks <u>$2,075</u> Bank service fees <u>$18</u>
Adjusted book <u>$61,724</u> <u>$61,724</u>
balance
Answer:
65 firms will be in the industry at the new long run equilibrium
Explanation:
in the long run the P=ATC
quantity before the change is
200 = 1000-4Q
4Q = 800
Q= 200
each firm output = Q/number of firms = 200 / 50
q = 4
new quantity is
200 = 1240-4Q
4Q = 1040
Q = 260
number of firms=new Q/q
=260/4 = 65
the number of firms is 65 in the long run.
Whirpool use the competences to enhanced their understanding
of their customers and develop product offerings by as we know that Whirpool
Corporation takes a cooperative approach to social media networks, with the
Digital Marketing, Public Relations, and Customer Care teams all concerted
effort to make available a reliable and trustworthy brand voice to its customers.
<span>Lost profits are consequential damages. Haddad is right that a buyer may not recover consequential damages that it could have prevented by cover. But Jewell-Rung offered legitimate reasons for not covering: the only Lakeland garments now available to it were those made by Olympic. Olympic would not sell a competitor the garments at reasonable prices. Further, Jewell-Rung could not rely on the quality of the garments manufactured by a different company. Jewell-Rung's failure to cover was reasonable and the company was entitled to prove its lost profits. Jewell-Rung Agency, Inc. v. Haddad Organization, Ltd</span>
