The correct answer is: violation of individual liberties, and the violation of the national and international laws.
As much as the government has plausible for doing it so, as we look back at the history of terrorist attacks, the government would argue the indefinite detention without, considering it aa form of prevention. If we know the human rights we will realize the most viable and obvious argument for being against that type of detention is the violation of national and international laws about the individual liberties. That's when there is no evidence of crime and when the individual does not represent national threat. It may be controversial the way government tries to deal with issues like that, but international organizations has made very clear their points about
Answer:
B. sold back to the American colonists.
Explanation:
Mercantilism under the British involves the colonists to bring raw materials in large quantities to England to convert or refine into final products. In return, these refined products would then be sold back to the American colonists through exportation. This is based on the belief that raw materials are cheaper or brings lower revenue to the nations, while refined products brings more economic value to the nations. Also the American colonies serves as a ready made export market for England.
The Pennsylvania Dutch<span> (Pennsilfaanisch Deitsch) are a cultural group formed by early </span>German<span>-speaking </span>immigrants<span> to </span>Pennsylvania<span> and their descendants. This early wave of </span>settlers<span>, which would eventually coalesce to form the </span>Pennsylvania Dutch<span>, began in the late 17th century and concluded in the late 18th century.</span>
Answer:to restrict the colonies' ability to trade
to make it easier for the colonists to trade with the Dutch
to make it harder to import molasses from other countries
Explanation:
