1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nikitich [7]
3 years ago
6

I need help please :)

Mathematics
1 answer:
IRISSAK [1]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Just subtract all the numbers from 38.75

You might be interested in
Some more math stuff I don't know of :(
Nutka1998 [239]

They are both 40°. This is bc 180-65-75=40

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Test the claim below about the mean of the differences for a population of paired data at the level of significance α Assume the
Evgen [1.6K]

Complete Question

The complete question is shown on the first uploaded image

Answer:

The  correct option is F

t =  1.17

t_ {\alpha , df} =t_ {0.10 , 8} = 1.86

Since the test statistics<u> is outside </u>the rejection region , <u>we fail to reject </u>the null hypothesis ,There<u> is no</u>  statistically significant evidence to reject the claim

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

    The  claim is  \mu =  0

Hence  

      The  null hypothesis is  H_o  :  \mu = 0

       The  alternative is  H_a  :  \mu  \ne  0

Generally the test statistics is mathematically represented as  

                 t =  \frac{\= d - \mu_d }{ \frac{s_d}{ \sqrt{n} } }

=>              t =  \frac{3.5 -0 }{ \frac{8.94}{ \sqrt{9} } }

=>              t =  1.17

Generally the degree of freedom is mathematically represented as

      df  =  n- 1

      df  =  9 -  1

      df  =  8

From the student t-distribution table  the critical value of  \alpha at a degree of freedom of  8 is  

          t_ {\alpha , df} =t_ {0.10 , 8} = 1.86

Since the t_ {\alpha , df} is  outside the rejection region , we fail to reject the null hypothesis ,There is no sufficient evidence to reject the claim

4 0
4 years ago
The estimated product of 20.7 and 9.18 after rounding both factors to the nearest whole number is
gogolik [260]
189 because 20.7 rounds to 21 and 9.18 rounds to 9
21 * 9 = 189

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Do all 6 digits numbers have 6 addenda in their expanded form
stiks02 [169]
No, for example - 6,005,100 = 6,000,000+5,000+100. Hope this helps!!!
7 0
4 years ago
TIMED TEST PLEASE HELP!!!!! Explain how you got the answer as well!
Alla [95]

Answer:

90

Step-by-step explanation:

50+40=90

i really hope this helps... take care

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Explain why the order of operations is important. Use at least three
    13·1 answer
  • Divide el rufini6x-4x+2 entre x-2<br> x+2x+x+2 entrex+2
    12·1 answer
  • Hmm it would have seem that I'm in need of help here help with this
    15·1 answer
  • Jaimie ran 3 1/2 miles on Monday she ran half as far on Tuesday as she did on Monday how far did Jaimie run in all on Monday and
    15·1 answer
  • Solve for x.
    10·2 answers
  • Helpppp with homework
    14·2 answers
  • Which number line shows the solution of 4x - 36 ​
    11·1 answer
  • How do you find the radius of a circle?
    11·2 answers
  • Please help!! im very confused
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP 30+POINTS, THESE ARE VERY IMPORTANT
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!