1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Murrr4er [49]
2 years ago
5

How did russia saw the crisis of ukraine in 2014?

History
1 answer:
Alona [7]2 years ago
6 0

Vladimir Putin said that Russian troops in the Crimean peninsula were aimed "to ensure proper conditions for the people of Crimea to be able to freely express their will", whilst Ukraine and other nations argue that such intervention is a violation of Ukraine's sovereignty.

You might be interested in
What publication convinced colonists that it was time to make the break from Britain and create a new nation of their own?
Nitella [24]
The pamphlet common sense was the publication told them to break away from britain
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Growing conflict between the north and the south 1850-1860
romanna [79]
The south and north hated each other for verious reasons. for one the north wanted to abolish slavery and the south wanted to keep slavery this caused tention between the north and south. more people were moving to the north instead of the south so this angered the north. the north wanted to trade the slavery law but the the south didnt this caused the north and south to war
7 0
3 years ago
The United States region labeled with the number 6 on the map above is known as the __________.
svlad2 [7]

Answer:

The answer is B

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which challenges can occur as a result of a growing population?
Len [333]
There can be numerous challenges but the biggest are sickness, lack of proper food and drink, increase in pollution in the area, and increased death due to these factors, Hope this helped! ^-^
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were andrew johnson policies concerning the rights of African Americans?
Lelu [443]

for the most part, historians view Andrew Johnson as the worst possible person to have served as President at the end of the American Civil War. Because of his gross incompetence in federal office and his incredible miscalculation of the extent of public support for his policies, Johnson is judged as a great failure in making a satisfying and just peace. He is viewed to have been a rigid, dictatorial racist who was unable to compromise or to accept a political reality at odds with his own ideas. Instead of forging a compromise between Radical Republicans and moderates, his actions united the opposition against him. His bullheaded opposition to the Freedmen's Bureau Bill, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and the Fourteenth Amendment eliminated all hope of using presidential authority to affect further compromises favorable to his position. In the end, Johnson did more to extend the period of national strife than he did to heal the wounds of war.

Most importantly, Johnson's strong commitment to obstructing political and civil rights for blacks is principally responsible for the failure of Reconstruction to solve the race problem in the South and perhaps in America as well. Johnson's decision to support the return of the prewar social and economic system—except for slavery—cut short any hope of a redistribution of land to the freed people or a more far-reaching reform program in the South.

Historians naturally wonder what might have happened had Lincoln, a genius at political compromise and perhaps the most effective leader to ever serve as President, lived. Would African Americans have obtained more effective guarantees of their civil rights? Would Lincoln have better completed what one historian calls the "unfinished revolution" in racial justice and equality begun by the Civil War? Almost all historians believe that the outcome would have been far different under Lincoln's leadership.

Among historians, supporters of Johnson are few in recent years. However, from the 1870s to around the time of World War II, Johnson enjoyed high regard as a strong-willed President who took the courageous high ground in challenging Congress's unconstitutional usurpation of presidential authority. In this view, much out of vogue today, Johnson is seen to have been motivated by a strict constructionist interpretation of the Constitution and by a firm belief in the separation of powers. This perspective reflected a generation of historians who were critical of Republican policy and skeptical of the viability of racial equality as a national policy. Even here, however, apologists for Johnson acknowledge his inability to effectively deal with congressional challenges due to his personal limitations as a leader.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Please help me out here!
    12·1 answer
  • What was the outcome of the battle of Charleston?
    13·1 answer
  • What American invention helped to increase cotton production?
    7·1 answer
  • How did many countries provide for additional raw materials and foodstuffs?
    6·2 answers
  • How the British dominated India as a colony?
    11·2 answers
  • 25 POINTS What important event occurred in 1718?
    13·2 answers
  • during the world war 1 african american fought in live combat and were recognized by the US as heroes for their bravery
    9·1 answer
  • What was the Vulgate?
    8·2 answers
  • What effect resulted from decolonization? Sort each effect into the correct category
    10·2 answers
  • How might the mongols have overcome tfade restrictions due to the mountainous region in which they lived
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!