<h2>
Answer with explanation:</h2>
Given : In a restaurant, the proportion of people who order coffee with their dinner is p.
Sample size : n= 144
x= 120
The null and the alternative hypotheses if you want to test if p is greater than or equal to 0.85 will be :-
Null hypothesis : 
[ it takes equality (=, ≤, ≥) ]
Alternative hypothesis : 
[its exactly opposite of null hypothesis]
∵Alternative hypothesis is left tailed, so the test is a left tailed test.
Test statistic : 
Using z-vale table ,
Critical value for 0.05 significance ( left-tailed test)=-1.645
Since the calculated value of test statistic is greater than the critical value , so we failed to reject the null hypothesis.
Conclusion : We have enough evidence to support the claim that p is greater than or equal to 0.85.
Answer:
no. it is not because 0.6 is a decimal
<h3>
Answer: 25w+200 > 750</h3>
==========================================================
Explanation:
He starts off with 200 cards. Then he adds on 25w more cards for each week (w). Overall, he'll have 200+25w cards
We can think of it like this:
- After 1 week, he adds on 25*1 = 25 cards
- After 2 weeks, he adds on 25*2 = 50 cards total
- After 3 weeks, he adds on 25*3 = 75 cards total
- After 4 weeks, he adds on 25*4 = 100 cards total, and so on.
- After w weeks, he adds on 25w cards total
So that's another way to see where the 25w comes from.
The expression 200+25w is the same as 25w+200. This is because we can add two numbers in any order.
------------
Since he wants to know when he'll have more than 750 cards, this means we set 25w+200 greater than 750.
That's how we get to the answer of 25w+200 > 750
Notice how there isn't a line under the inequality sign. We aren't using the "greater than or equal to" symbol here. We want to know when the cards gets over 750, but we don't want to know when it's equal to 750.
Answer:
göt kafa frenki ............
