Chinua Achebe created civil peace to tell a story and to teach a great lesson of optimism that followed after the civil war.
<h3>What is civil peace?</h3>
This is a short story by Chinua Achebe written in the year 1971 about the story of the civil war and the civil peace that followed.
This story was written just after the civil war that lasted from 1967-1970 and the civil peace which followed just after the war, in the story, Jonathan returned to a destroyed town with the positive attitude of his own home being intact.
Hence, Chinua Achebe created civil peace to tell a story and to teach a significant lesson of optimism.
Read more about <em>civil peace</em> here:
brainly.com/question/1856463
#SPJ1
<span>In the novel Frankenstein, what the creature's connection to nature suggests about him is that C. he is connected to Victor and has human feelings. Although he was created from the dead, he still has some human feelings remaining, such as love, and loneliness, and hatred, and fear, etc. He also feels very connected to his creator, Victor, which additionally shows his human emotions. We cannot know whether his love for nature is artistic, as he is still practically a "zombie," so option A is unlikely correct. B is also incorrect because it doesn't convey all of his emotions. D is definitely incorrect because there is more to Frankenstein's monster than just the feelings of possession and greed. </span>
Answer:
Poe uses the first line of the story to build suspense in the following manner:
C. Poe informs the reader that Fortunato has wronged the narrator but doesn't say specifically what Fortunato did which creates a sense of uncertainty.
Explanation:
This question is about the short story "The Cask of Amontillado," by author Edgar Allan Poe. Take a look at how the story begins:
<em>THE thousand injuries of Fortunato I had borne as I best could, but when he ventured upon insult I vowed revenge.</em><em> You, who so well know the nature of my soul, will not suppose, however, that gave utterance to a threat. At length I would be avenged; this was a point definitely, settled --but the very definitiveness with which it was resolved precluded the idea of risk. I must not only punish but punish with impunity. A wrong is unredressed when retribution overtakes its redresser. It is equally unredressed when the avenger fails to make himself felt as such to him who has done the wrong.</em>
<u>We get to know two things from the get-go: the narrator feels that Fortunato has offended him; and the narrator is adamant about avenging himself.</u>
<u>However, at no point does the narrator reveal what Fortunato has done. Apparently, Fortunato has injured him before. Now, it is an offense. But how can we trust this narrator if he does not reveal what happened? Maybe he is too sensitive and took things too personally. Maybe nothing happened at all- he might be insane, for all we know. We are left with this uncertainty, even though the narrator tells us we know him well. We do not. He does not offer us enough information to judge for ourselves.</u>
The fish died, because, using context clues, the word mournfully is usually associated with death or someone/ something leaving, and since a fish couldn't swim away, we would have to believe that the fish has died.
