They thought that if Communist leaders took control of Vietnam, all of Southeast Asia would ultimately ally with the Soviet Union.
Explanation:
During the Cold War period, Vietnam was highly divided internally, having the Communists on one side, and the King on the other side. Both sides enjoyed big support, with the Communists dominating in the north, and the King in the south. The Communists wanted to make Vietnam a Communist country and ally with the Soviets, while the King wanted to preserve his royal power and be in good relations with the Western democracies.
The United States entered a war with Vietnam, and the main reason for that was to stop the spread of Communism in the country, as they feared that once Vietnam is Communist and allied with the Soviets, the rest of Southeast Asia will follow. The Communists in Vietnam manged to win the war, embarrassing the United States, and established Communism in the country. The results were not as devastating in the region as the United States' officials thought they would be though.
Countries in Southeast Asia that adopted Communism were:
Countries that didn't accepted Communism were:
- Thailand
- Burma
- Malaysia
- Indonesia
- Singapore
- the Philippines
- Brunei
Learn more about Communism brainly.com/question/12173354
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
Explanation:
Remark
Of those choices given, the answer should be A
B: the Senate is elected by the people.
C: C is true but not because of checks and balances. C is part of the constitution.
D: No that is a constitutional matter.
Answer A
Answer:
We can list as similarities between these two empires their location, the way how they built their cities, and the period they build their empires. The differences, however, are more visible. For the differences, we can separate into two points: the government and the war practices.
Explanation:
The Babylonians were harsh with their laws. An example of this point is the Code of Hammurabi. Dated from around the year 1700 BC, this law agreement was based on the lex talionis, or "Eye for an eye, tooth for a tooth". The violence of these laws is one of the main differences between Babylonians and Hittites.
The Hittites Law Code was more complex and consistent. This is because of their nomadism, and especially because they had the precept to capture their enemies. So, their laws must be range. We can name their laws based on the concept of causes, which means, your actions would be punished according to their strength. However, there was no death penalty (capital punishment), and many of the crimes were solved trough tax payments or fines.
When it comes to war, the Babylonians were not used to combat. Even if they had an army and the pretense idea of expansion, they were closer to the research and scholar world. Many astronomical discoveries were proceeded by the Babylonians. On the other hand, Hittites were warriors.
According to Christian beliefs, Jesus was sent to Earth to die for the sins of humanity, since Christians believe that Jesus is in fact the personal savior of all Christians.
