England first sent a group of colonists called the London Company in December of 1606. So England had a part in the settling of the James River colony too. John Smith ordered the colonists to clear land and plant crops that they traded with the Algonquin Indians.
John Rolfe arrived in Jamestown at the James River colony in 1611. He helped them pay for their settlement by teaching them to grow tobacco and selling it to England in 1614. That was a great success.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "an Islamic sultan." In the Malay Peninsula and small coastal states of Southeast Asia, the head of state was frequently <span>an Islamic sultan</span>
Answer:
Option: A. Population increased as new crops were introduced, improving diets and increasing life expectancy.
Explanation:
Before the arrival of the Europeans in the New World, it inhabited with Native Indians. After Christopher Columbus discovered America, there was a beginning of the Colombian Exchange. New plants and animals introduced in the Old World. The discovery of a new region with resources changed the nature of trade between Europe and the New World. It introduced new agricultural products, including tomatoes, pumpkin, potatoes, chillies, cocoa, maize, peanuts, and beans. The arrival of many crops and plants in Europe had nutrition with calories and flavour, which led to an increase in life expectancy.
The process of adaptation of new food led to an increase in the population in Europe. Rye and millet replaced by maize. Sweet potatoes became popular in Spain and Portugal. Later it reaches in Ireland and Poland as a staple crop. The new crops gave high nutrition than cereals.
Answer:
Personally (this opinion could differ for yourself), I am against the electoral college and I am for direct democracy vote.
Explanation:
Having a pure democracy would ensure actual and tangible democracy for which this country claims it holds.
This would prevent gerry-mandering which is used against people of color´s cote often times to take away their vote.
Having an direct democracy would ensure americans to vote for who they actually like, not who they seem who would win and thus make 3rd parties alittle more viable.
