Answer:
A)
Explanation:
The main difference between these two terms is that a concurring opinion agrees with the majority decision, but for different legal reasons, while a dissenting opinion explains why one or more justices disagree with the majority. Each of which tends to ocurr often in court cases where various judges analyze and pass judgment of another judges decision on a specific case. With a concurring opinion most, if not all, judges agree with the decision that has been made but tend to give different reasons as to why they believe the decision was justified.
Herman Talmadge, son of Eugene Talmadge<span>, served as </span>governor<span> of Georgia </span>Herman Talmadge<span>for a brief time in early 1947 and again from 1948 to 1954. In 1956 Talmadge was elected to the U.S. Senate, where he served until his defeat in 1980
</span>
Answer:
With its more positive tone the Texas Bill of Rights provides much the same protections as the U.S. Bill of Rights. But it also extends beyond federal protections. For example, Sec. 3a explicitly forbids discrimination based on sex, race, color, creed, or national origin.
So true
Answer: Tend to feel valued despite of attitudes and behaviors they persist
Explanation:
According to the theory of Roger, human tends to develop as fully functioning and ideal to own-self on basis of positive regard in condition they are present .They have the feeling of being valued and importance without considering the behavior they have towards others.This creates a fully developed personality
Other option are incorrect because feeling of vain ,not turning into completely functioning and following or doing what other people want them to do is not the part that gives a person feeling of real self
