1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jeka57 [31]
2 years ago
5

Why would it not be appropriate for Congress to get the Supreme Court’s opinion about a bill it is considering?

History
2 answers:
Reika [66]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

B

Explanation:

It will mess up the powers of congress

Bogdan [553]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:it is c

Explanation:

well they can’t judge it if no rule about it exists

You might be interested in
Good evening! Can someone please answer this, ill give you brainliest and your earning 50 points. Would be very appreciated.
slava [35]

Answer:

Adjusting taxing and spending in the federal budget

Explanation:

  • Fiscal policy is a good policy
  • It refers to arrange the taxes .
  • Government takes tax and use them in budgets

So Option A is correct

8 0
2 years ago
What is there no word for in any native language ??
NISA [10]

Answer:

I do not understand the question.

Explanation:

(. - .)

6 0
3 years ago
In which landmark case did the supreme court rule that "separate but equal" facilities were legal?
MakcuM [25]
Plessy v. Ferguson<span>, 163 U.S. 537 (1896), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court issued in 1896. It upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation laws for public facilities as long as the segregated facilities were equal in quality – a doctrine that came to be known as "separate but equal".</span>
7 0
3 years ago
If the U.S. constitution began as suggested by the cartoon what might the impact be on the Supreme Court?
lisabon 2012 [21]

The cartoon you are referring to shows three business men in front of the U.S. Founding Fathers. One of them, acting as a spokesperson, interpellates the writers of the Constitution by asking them to scratch the first words of the Constitution ("We, the people..") and replace them with the statement "We, the anonymous corporate donors, untraceable foreign contributors and assorted billionaires.." So, if the U.S. Constitution began as suggested by the cartoon, the Supreme Court would make decisions that favored corporations ("we, the anonymous corporate donors") over individuals ("we, the people"). Fortunately this is not the case, but, throughout its history, and depending upon the Chief Justice who has led it, the Supreme Court has sometimes been especially friendly to business.  

8 0
3 years ago
"What is the main idea of this cartoon?
Umnica [9.8K]
The answer to this would most definitely be number 2 (:
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the teapot dome scandal
    14·2 answers
  • Chinese and korean cultures have had a tremendous influence on japanese culture because the countries are only a few hundred mil
    8·2 answers
  • Describe how globalization has changed culture over time.
    6·1 answer
  • Explain why the king and queen of Europe wanted to establish colonies in North America
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following pairs of words rhymes?
    14·1 answer
  • what was one effect of the slave trade on Africa A most africans grew rich B african societies suffered C africa gained capable
    14·1 answer
  • Beijing was freed from warlord control in 1928. using the map key, determine how long, at the most, beijing's freedom lasted and
    10·2 answers
  • Why did many Northerners come to the South after the Civil War?
    7·2 answers
  • Each of the following can be a form of collateral when applying for a loan EXCEPT:
    11·2 answers
  • Crowded small apartments where 12-13 adults could be sleeping in the same room
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!