Answer: As the final arbiter of the law, the Court is charged with ensuring the American people the promise of equal justice under law
Answer:
What exactly is the question here. I'm kind of confused. But will be happy to help you if you further elaborate. :]
Explanation:
Answer:
probative value
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides legal protection against search and seizure without good reason and without a search and seizure warrant. As we can see from the question above, Mick Stoner was charged with marijuana, which was taken from a legal dispensary in Denver, seized without a search warrant, so Mick Stoner's defense attorney disputes the evidential value of the evidence, claiming that the truck's initial search violated the Fourth Amendment.
To dispute the probative value of the evidence means that the evidence gathered, in this case, is not guaranteed, by itself, to support a condemnatory sentence, thus requiring the repetition in court of some of the evidence produced.
