1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
faltersainse [42]
1 year ago
5

_______ is the application of law from previous cases to current cases with substantially similar circumstances.

Law
1 answer:
Llana [10]1 year ago
6 0
The answer is…. Precedent.
You might be interested in
Can you sue and win if someone is black mailing you over something illegal you did. If not is there any thing else you can do to
LiRa [457]
I’m not sure that you’d win the argument as you could possibly face repercussions of the act you did that was illegal...two wrongs won’t make a right basically.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Keisha committed a crime in New York, but the punishment for the crime is harsher in Georgia, so the prosecutor organizes her ca
zubka84 [21]

Answer:

Keisha has the right to be tried in New York under the Sixth Amendment: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed[.]”

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
On Election Day, which Poll Worker position is responsible for the setup and breakdown of the EViD?
Liula [17]

Answer:

The Insepctor

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How do you identify employees who have violent potential and how do you deal with them?
spin [16.1K]

Explanation:

<u><em>i will focus to them of what he do or they do that not know them that i keep watching they do everything.It because i didn't like that kind of ability liying to everyone can't work fairlly it's so unfair.</em></u>

6 0
2 years ago
If you were a defense attorney, what would you want the jurors to know about the limits of forensic evidence?
OlgaM077 [116]

The results indicate that the 10 pieces of evidence mock jurors reported would be most important when deciding a verdict are (in order of importance): (1) DNA, (2) fingerprints, (3) weapon, (4) video records, (5) crime-scene photos, (6) gunshot residue, (7) other bodily secretions, (8) video confession, (9) forensic ...

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following theorists argued that an individual’s personality is based on the id, the ego, and the superego?
    5·1 answer
  • Which statement about greenhouse gas emissions is supported by the pie chart? More carbon dioxide is emitted in the United State
    7·2 answers
  • write clear-cut legal opinion supported with vivid example and explain 'whether there is a social contract between the rulers an
    12·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT a hair characteristic scientists view microscopically?
    5·1 answer
  • The government can take your property for
    12·2 answers
  • A small cruise ship struck a whale swimming underwater, causing the ship to suddenly lurch sideways. A passenger on the ship who
    10·1 answer
  • A judge is getting ready to begin a trial. She realizes that the defendant, who is accused of assault, is a neighbor that she do
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT true concerning blood typing?
    11·1 answer
  • What drugs are commonly abused?​
    15·2 answers
  • What does 'distributive justice' mean in philosophy?.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!