A feature of imperfect competition is <u>economies of scale</u>, which means that as the firm expands its production, average costs of production fall. Therefore, the firm can <u>decrease</u> its costs of production by selling internationally.
Answer:
Nepal has undergone and is consistently undergoing changes in its governance, and structure of society for which it has lead to frequent changes in the constitution.
Explanation:
The Government of Nepal act 1948, was changed because there were no democratic rights in the Constitution.
The first democratic constitution enacted in the year 1959 was scrapped by the King of Nepal because he felt that the constitution is trying to reduce his powers.
The next constitution enacted in 1962 was scrapped after a short period of time because it was an anti democratic constitution.
In the year 1990 the King of Nepal used the constitution for selfish needs.
Sophia's intelligence would rely on the people who adopted her, and what they and others have taught her.
However, one can argue that IQ isn't entirely accurate when it comes to intelligence. For instance, emotional intelligence is not a factor when determining that score.
If you found this especially helpful, I'd appreciate if you'd vote me Brainliest for your answer. I want to be able to assist more users one-on-one!
I’m not sure try using Socratic... B
Answer:
Family resemblance (German: Familienähnlichkeit) is a philosophical idea made popular by Ludwig Wittgenstein, with the best known exposition given in his posthumously published book Philosophical Investigations (1953).[1] It argues that things which could be thought to be connected by one essential common feature may in fact be connected by a series of overlapping similarities, where no one feature is common to all of the things. Games, which Wittgenstein used as an example to explain the notion, have become the paradigmatic example of a group that is related by family resemblances. It has been suggested that Wittgenstein picked up the idea and the term from Nietzsche, who had been using it, as did many nineteenth century philologists, when discoursing about language families.[2]
Explanation:
