1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vichka [17]
2 years ago
14

Provide an exaple

History
2 answers:
Shalnov [3]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I agree with limiting the choices they can make until they are mature enough. This prevents them from doing something reckless and irresponsible in the moment. This also protects them from danger they are unaware of.

Leto [7]2 years ago
7 0
Removing young peoples choices is a smart decision at an early age to prevent injuries to others and themselves. Young people are known to take on reckless personalities and tend to grow out of them when they are nearing adulthood
You might be interested in
As _____ migrated out of fertile river valleys, they spread their culture through _____.
Lapatulllka [165]
<span>When it comes to what happened to the people's culture with migration patters, the answer is that as the people migrated the spread culture through diffusion. This means that their cultures mixed and new cultures were made by having cultures diffuse and mix and adopt elements of other cultures, but they would also lose some parts of their own that would get lost in time. </span>
4 0
3 years ago
Take up the White Man's burden–
fgiga [73]

Answer:

The correct answer is to benefit colonial peoples

Explanation:

To benefit colonial is the right answer because Kipling was someone who proclaimed the idea that European colonial powers are taking on their back the obligation to illuminate Native people of the colonies. They are actually sacrificing according to Kipling, so they could help them evolve.

That is why other options are false.

Europeans have no benefit. They are "helping."

5 0
3 years ago
Opposite of British mercantilism?​
BigorU [14]
Gay lesbian dumb kid
8 0
3 years ago
Why does anyone turn to terror as a tool of persuasion?
STatiana [176]

Answer:

Although terrorism has often been portrayed as low intensity warfare, it also can be visualized as a form of persuasion, one frequently ineffective due to logical fallacies. Successful persuasion is dependent on the interaction of four elements: speakers, arguments, situations, and audiences. Terrorism constitutes a type of rhetoric in which terrorist speakers communicate with media audiences, using symbolic violence as a means of argument.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
He pennsylvania mutiny highlighted a weakness of the articles of confederation because congress was unable to
Rasek [7]
Help soldiers who wanted payment for service
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Pope Leo the third Crowned Charlemagne in return
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is the best definition of the public policies of a government
    14·1 answer
  • Who did France give the Louisiana Territory to after the French and Indian War? A. Great Britain B. Portugal C. Spain D. Italy
    9·2 answers
  • Do you think President Carter was right in not allowing American athletes to perform in the 1980 summer Olympic Games? Justify y
    11·1 answer
  • No state can create a law that goes against the Constitution because.... A)The state has no power B)Only Congress can make laws
    6·1 answer
  • Which of the following people is responsible for making the Christian faith the official religion of the Roman Empire? A. Pope J
    8·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    7·1 answer
  • 16. How did the actions of Greece and Yugoslavia differ from that of Hungary, Romania, and
    8·1 answer
  • Summarize the Immigration Act of 1891. It’s that simple. Please give a proper response. 10 pts &amp; brainliest.
    11·1 answer
  • How many men did it take to carry David <br> ( from Michelangelo )
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!