1) ariel spying over Cuba produced pictures that showed missile silos being built in Cuba. The design of the silos made it clear they were designed for missiles, and it made no sense for Cuba to put in anything less than nuclear missiles there. Missiles they could not build themselves, so had to come from the Soviet Union.
2) Only minutes. A launch from the Soviet Union to the US only takes about 20 minutes. Depending on the range of the missiles put into the silos, warning time would have been anywhere from 3-10 minutes. Not enough time to verify that it was a launch, and not a detection system malfunction, forcing America to launch immediately, or risk losing its capacity to strike back.
3) A direct attack or invasion of Cuba would have forced the Soviet Union to respond in kind. The USSR simply could not abandon Cuba, without losing all credibility among its allies and vassal states. So they would likely have struck back at the US, probably in Europe. This would have dangerously escalated the tensions, and increased the probability of nuclear war. Other officials believed that a quick,determined strike would not only eliminate the immediate threat of missiles in Cuba, but possibly overthrow the regime and force the USSR to accept the situation. The idea of a naval blockade was a compromise position. A threat of force, but one that allowed the USSR to back off. After all, so long as the missiles were not put into the silos, they were no threat.
"A government operates with the goal of promoting human rights" is based on John Locke's definition of the social contract.
<u>Option: C</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The concept of social contracts states "that people work together in society according to an arrangement that determines moral and political rules of behaviour". Number of individuals seem to have faith that if we expend a life by a social agreement, we should live by our own choices but morally rather than just because it is predicted of a divine being.
John Locke's interpretation of the theory of social contracts hits in suggesting that the only right individual to give up in order to join civil society and its rewards is the right to punish others for violating their rights.
No one. Jk whats up i can help you
Answer:
A,B,D are the correct answer good luck everyone
