Answer:
How Remixes Hijack Your Brain
For this lab, watch the video “How Remixes Hijack Your Brain” to further dive into the world of remixing and mashups as we read about in the unit. After watching the video, answer the questions below.
Do you think the remixes and mashups that are shown throughout the video are breaking copyright laws? Why or why not?
No, not really because she downloads the videos and puts them in one collaboration to show the differences between different things and facts
The video shows examples of remixes and mashups that include political candidates. Do you think that these remixes and mashups might change people’s opinions about the candidates they feature? Why or why not?
Yes and No. Yes, because sometimes people can change their opinion about someone they didn’t like before. No, because people will still keep their opinions about which candidate you want or would like to be president or Vice President school wise anyway.
The video gives us several examples of how remixing hijacks our brain. From the examples given, which do you think is the most powerful reason as to why these remixes hijack our brain? Why?
The candidate one because it can show differences between both or more candidates to see who will be the leader of the country.
Why do you think remixing is so popular today? Explain your answer.
It can help people understand what an assignment is about or project by seeing it in simple terms.
Explanation: I got you broham
How many people are in the class ?
Answer:
the answer to this is 7 over 13
Answer:
See explaination
Explanation:
The Issue : Gary being the lessor that leased his commercial property to John to conduct bakery business with an obligation to repair modified or damaged parts if any after lease term. However, John couldnt repair the same but paid $3,100 to Gary to cover the repair expenses.
The Legislation : The required Provision says that lessee is reponsible to keep the premises in good condition and to handover back to the lessor in the same condition as it was in the beginning of the lease period except normal wear and tear. Here damage to the building was not due to passage of time or Act of God . It was due to installation of Machinery and fixtures in the building by the lessee.
According to Polster, Inc. v. Swing, tenant was reponsible to repair the damage to the drop ceiling, ceiling tiles, interior walls, front door sill and jamb as it was not normal wear and tear.
Also in the case of Churchill Forge, Inc. v. Brown, there is no unjust in requiring a tenant to reimburse the expenses to landlord. As a result cost will shift to the tenant/lessee as the case may be.
In Conclusion : Thus it is the responsibilty of John to repair the property or else to reimburse the entire expenses incurred to Gary to put the building in good shape other than for normal wear and tear.
Here , the installing of machinery and fixtures should be considered as capital expenditure as lonterm benefit is determined. However, repairs at the end of the lease period will be categorised as revenue expenditure and considered in Profit & loss account for the purpose of tax.
Answer: 1/2
Explanation:
When y is inversely proportional to x. This implies that:
y = k/x
If y = –8 when x = –2, then the constant of proportionality will be;
y = k/x
-8 = k/-2
k = (-8 × -2)
k = 16
when x = 32, the value of y will be:
y = k/x
y = 16/32
y = 1/2
