I’m not the person you should be asking..
he is ⬇️
Umm you just gave me a fact not a question is there anything else you can give me that could help me solve this "question"?
At the time, Oregon was controlled by the British and French Canadian fur traders, and a state in that region that later became a part of the USA was Washington
Answer: Have no effect
Explanation: The contextual interference during exercise is in fact the occurrence that interference during exercise is useful for enhancing and improving skills. However, higher levels of interference during practice result in poorer performance than when it comes to lower levels of interference. Scientific studies have shown that, with increasing levels of interference during practice, performance degradation occurs when it comes to motor skills. Contextual interference in motor learning and enhancement of motor skills is in fact an interference due to some exercise / practice that is within the context of the exercises / practices, that is, an integral part of a larger number of exercises. Thus, one exercise, that is, practice, interferes with other exercises / practices, and when it is at a lower level, then the motor skills increase. But in this case, for people with limited motor skills and exercise experience, a high level of interference that would otherwise reduce the development of motor skills, in this case, will have no effect, since those people have not developed those skills anyway.
Adam Smith called the notion that people make economic choices that are best for themselves, but that self-interest leads them to do what is best for the society as invisible hand. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "A". I hope this helps you.
