1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marina86 [1]
2 years ago
12

Can someone please help me? :(

History
2 answers:
icang [17]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

D

Explanation:

The Mongol army conquered hundreds of cities and villages and killed millions of people. One estimate is that about 11% of the world's population was killed either during or immediately after the Mongol invasions (around 37.75–60 million people in Eurasia).

alexandr402 [8]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

D. He used extreme violence to scare enemies into surrendering.

Explanation:

see answer.

You might be interested in
Which of these statements are false?
Norma-Jean [14]
Your answer is CCCCCCCC
5 0
3 years ago
Why did tha United States want to acquire Oregon County
Marina86 [1]
The land was free and perfect for farming, if settlers survived the journey to Oregon the land was all theirs. But not only did the US like it, Britain and Russia also liked it. So the US told people to move there ASAP so it would officially be claimed by America.
8 0
3 years ago
the federal income tax is a ____ tax because the higher the income a person has,the higher the percentage that person pays in ta
Ad libitum [116K]

The Federal Income Tax is a  PROGRESSIVE  TAX, Because, The higher the income a person has, The higher the percentage that person pays in tax.



Explanation of What's a  Progress Tax's Perentage is:

A Progressive Tax's Percentage is dependent upon the Income Bracket you are in. Therefore, if you are in a higher income bracket, this means, you earn more. However,  you would pay a much higher percentage, than someone in the lower income bracket. This is why it is called a, "Progressive Tax", Because, it gets progressively bigger.








Hope that helps!!!                                  : )

8 0
3 years ago
In what ways, if any, did Francisco Franco appeal to the people
vodka [1.7K]
To protect spain and the people of spain from non-spain forces. Even if he was a monarchist, and ensure himself as protector 
3 0
3 years ago
Compare and contrast Hobbes’ and Locke’s views of human nature and the role government should play
svet-max [94.6K]

Thomas Hobbes believed that people were inherently suspicious of one another and in competition with one another.  This led him to propose that government should have supreme authority over people in order to maintain security and a stable society.

John Locke argued that people were born as blank slates, open to learning all things by experience.  Ultimately this meant Locke viewed human beings in a mostly positive way, and so his approach to government was to keep the people empowered to establish and regulate their own governments for the sake of building good societies.

Further explanation:

Both English philosophers believed there is a "social contract" -- that governments are formed by the will of the people.  But their theories on why people want to live under governments were very different.

Thomas Hobbes published his political theory in <em>Leviathan</em>  in 1651, following the chaos and destruction of the English Civil War.  He saw human beings as naturally suspicious of one another, in competition with each other, and evil toward one another as a result.  Forming a government meant giving up personal liberty, but gaining security against what would otherwise be a situation of every person at war with every other person.

John Locke published his <em>Two Treatises on Civil Government</em> in 1690, following the mostly peaceful transition of government power that was the Glorious Revolution in England.  Locke believed people are born as blank slates--with no preexisting knowledge or moral leanings.  Experience then guides them to the knowledge and the best form of life, and they choose to form governments to make life and society better.

In teaching the difference between Hobbes and Locke, I've often put it this way.  If society were playground basketball, Hobbes believed you must have a referee who sets and enforces rules, or else the players will eventually get into heated arguments and bloody fights with one another, because people get nasty in competition that way.   Locke believed you could have an enjoyable game of playground basketball without a referee, but a referee makes the game better because then any disputes that come up between players have a fair way of being resolved.    Of course, Hobbes and Locke never actually wrote about basketball -- a game not invented until 1891 in America by James Naismith.  But it's just an illustration I've used to try to show the difference of ideas between Hobbes and Locke.   :-)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was Georgia governed by different rules than the other southern colonies
    5·2 answers
  • Why did farmers begin forming cooperatives in the late 1800s?
    7·2 answers
  • In which region are the Gobeklitepe located
    15·1 answer
  • The Magna Carta stated that all of the following EXCEPT?
    15·1 answer
  • If Steve can’t decide what bank to take a loan from, what banking service would make a bank a better option than the others?
    15·1 answer
  • How is the principle of states' rights reflected in the Declaration of Independence or the Articles of Confederation?
    10·2 answers
  • Which japanese ruler brought korean &amp; chinese practices into ancient japan ?
    5·2 answers
  • In which conflict were five colonists killed by British soldiers
    15·2 answers
  • What was "infotainment"?
    13·2 answers
  • What was the u.s government purpose for invading afghanistan passing the patriot act and creating the department of homeland sec
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!