Answer:
Option: C. Radicals
Explanation:
The former Confederates had to swear an oath of allegiance after the Civil War. It promoted by Radical Republicans to prevent the political activity of Confederate veterans and supporters in the South. A confederate person had to swear to support and defend the Constitution of the United States.
Answer:
Why was the Enlightenment a turning point in history? It used logic and reason to explain the world. Enlightenment ideas completely changed the way nations are governed and how people viewed religion. People began to believe life should be enjoyed and that the world can be improved.
Explanation:
The 19th amendment is associated with the women's suffrage movement, as it provides for the right of women to vote.
<h3 /><h3>What was the Progressive Era?</h3>
It corresponds to the period between 1896 and 1916 in the United States, where movements for political and social reform took place, with the objective of protecting society's well-being and morals through solutions to the problems of industrialization and corruption, for example.
Therefore, through the suffragette movement, it helped in the inclusion of the 19th amendment that granted the right of women to vote and be voted.
Find out more about suffragette movement here:
brainly.com/question/8862360
#SPJ1
Answer:
Xia
first dynasty
formed by yu the great
Shang
System of writing
bronze technology using peice mold casting formed by king cheng tang
Answer:
I hope it helps u.
Explanation:
Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.
Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.
Mark me as brainlist answer,
Have a nice day,
Thank you ☺
