a) Proof by contradiction is different from traditional proof as it accepts a single example showing that a statement is false, instead of having the need to derive a general relationship for all input values.
b) The statement is true by contradiction as the sum of the measures is of 160º, and not 180º.
<h3>What are supplementary angles?</h3>
Two angles are called supplementary angles if the sum of their measures has a value of 180º.
The measures of the angles in this problem are given as follows:
Then the sum of the measures of this angles is given as follows:
90 + 70 = 160º.
Which is a different sum of 160º, confirming the statement that the angles are not supplementary by contradiction.
A similar problem, involving proof by contradiction and supplementary angles, is presented at brainly.com/question/28889480
#SPJ1
Answer:
94
Step-by-step explanation:
Its pretty simple,
The easiest way to find the missing number is to do 151-57, which = 94
Answer:
false
Step-by-step explanation:
9514 1404 393
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The answer statement tells you the transformation is a rotation. The original is in the 2nd quadrant, and the image is in the 1st quadrant, representing a clockwise rotation. AB points east, while A'B' points south, a rotation of 90° (clockwise). Each image point is the same distance from the origin as its preimage point. The origin is the center of rotation.
__
∆ABC is transformed by a <u> clockwise </u> rotation <u> 90 </u> degrees with a center at the <u> origin </u>.
The answer is -31 over 12.