What does Andrew Weiss mean when he says it

2 answers:

5 0

The thing which Andrew Weiss means when he says it would be "political gold" for Putin if the U.S. treated recent events as if there were a new Cold War with Russia is:

He believes that the economic sanctions would hurt America and its Western allies for years to come because of the amount of oil reserves cash Putin has.

This is the armed conflict which exists between two or more people or nations over a particular issue.

With the recent events in Ukraine with the Russian invasion, Russian expert, Andrew Weiss believes that if the United States treat the conflict as a new Cold War with Russia, then America would suffer economically and financially.

Read more about Cold War here:

brainly.com/question/856013

just olya [345]2 years ago

4 0

Andrew Weiss says if the U.S. treated recent events as new Cold War with Russia it would be "political gold" for Putin, means any economic sanction against big Russian industries made by the president to stop its move in Ukraine. It would hurt America and its allies, as Russia has a large amount of oil reserves.

<h3>Who is Vladimir Putin?</h3>

Vladimir Putin is Russian president who has decided to invade Ukraine as Russia didn't want Ukraine to join NATO.

Due to war between Ukraine and Russia. Andrew Weiss, vice president for studies at the Carnegie Endowment, believes that if America issued executive power to its president to sanction orders against the Russian industries would lead to its economic and financial suffering.

Therefore, it can be said that any order against the Russia would affect America's economy.

Learn more about Vladimir Putin here:

brainly.com/question/873757

You might be interested in

During the Spanish American war, Describe the harsh and challenging conditions of being an American soldier in this part of Asia

Aleks04 [339]

Answer: What Americans had in enthusiastic spirit, they lacked in military strength. The navy, although improved, was simply a shadow of what it would become by World War I.

Explanation: I had a question similar to this on an assignment, and i got it right and i used this answer

Source: https://www.ushistory.org/us/44d.asp

5 0

3 years ago

Do you believe that the government should have the right to limit your individual rights? Why or why not? MARK AS BRAINLIEST!

yulyashka [42]

Answer:

Yes.

Explanation:

Yes, I do believe that the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights. Though the wording of the sentence above may sound like I'm saying I believe the government is allowed to control people, that's the last thing I mean. People need rules and structure which is what the government provides. Imagine if there <em>wasn't</em> a government. There would be no soical order because people will have too much power and some will not use their civil liberties responsibly. I understand both sides, but overall, I do think the government should have the right to limit peoples' individual rights.

3 0

3 years ago

Which of the following would be violated if the United States were to annex Cuba following a conflict between the two countries?

Evgesh-ka [11]

The Teller Amendment is the correct answer.

After the end of the Spanish-American War, Senator Henry Teller of Colorado introduced the Teller Amendment in 1898, that the United States conquered Cuba until 1902, and did not violate the Teller Amendment to annex the Island. And the U.S. would help Cuba to gain independence and then withdraw all its troops from the country. This amendment was a part of President Mckinley's to resolve the issues between U.S and Spain. The United States promised to allow Cuba to be administered by its people, after assisting them to gain some stability and smooth over the dispute with Spain.