Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
The term "Use it or lose it" concerning the Intelligent Quotient implies that when individuals don't utilize, and stretch their brain or intelligence capacities, in the longer run, as individuals age or grow older, the brain or Intelligent Quotient will not deliver high or maximum performance.
In other words, the more individuals use their mental capacity, the more likely one is to retain that mental capacity, in the long run, otherwise, one loses it.
Answer:
I will conclude that modern science, narrowly defined, would be an integral part of some kind of daily life. Further clarification is given below.
Explanation:
- Yeah, science needs a great dealing of advanced theoretical knowledge, does as well something worth performing. The central method is fundamental, however, because if you concentrate on it, people will find that science isn't even that different from the common activities.
- Everything is part of the overall mechanism of "trying to make yourself a human with whom you would like to share the entire lives."
Answer:
Explanation:
Clarity. Complex words and syntax are a hindrance to clarity and should be avoided. ...
Don't describe each and every one of your own movements. ...
Avoid the second-person narrative. ...
To interest the reader, dynamic word choice is key. ...
Limit references.
I think it’s D when a poem rhymes you can easily point out important words.
Answer:If the story were told from John's perspective, it would be a much more detached view of the narrator's descent into madness. Although the readers do not know what John thinks, it is clear that he believes that the medical treatment is correct. Not only would his perspective add another dimension to the woman's madness, but it would make him a more sympathetic character and perhaps even make their love story more tragic.
Who does Gilman ultimately blame for the narrator's descent into madness? Why?
In some ways, Gilman can seem to blame both John and S. Weir Mitchell for the narrator's ultimate insanity. Although they both mean well, their decision to promote the "rest cure" treatment is certainly the catalyst for the narrator's mental break. However, at the same time, Gilman could blame the society of the time, a society that expected women to be perfect wives and mothers and nothing else.
What is the significance of the first-person perspective of the narrative?
The first-person perspective of the narrative is very important because it allows the reader to understand and experience the narrator's descent into madness on a personal level. Instead of discovering the narrator's insanity from the detached perspective of a third-person narrator, the reader is present in the narrator's head at every stage of her insanity. As a result, the story is much more powerful and ultimately more disconcerting.
Explanation:
