1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
olya-2409 [2.1K]
2 years ago
7

Pretend that it is 1940. Write a letter to the editor for your local newspaper in which you argue for or against the reelection

of FDR for an unprecedented third term as president of the United States. Pick one of the following specific roles from which to write--a) urban workers; b) farmers who own land; c) farmers who do not own land; d) business owners--and also explain how the character you have adopted would assume the other characters in the exercise will view the election.
History
1 answer:
notsponge [240]2 years ago
5 0

If you were to write a letter to the editor of a local newspaper as a farmer who owned land, you would argue for the reelection of FDR.

<h3>How would a famer who owned land argue?</h3>

Famers who owned land were mostly supporters of the New Deal policies of FDR because he worked to increase food prices, and to reduce surpluses which made prices lower.

He did this through the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) which paid famers who did not plant some of their lands for not doing so.

Farmers who owned lands would therefore receive government subsidies and enjoy higher prices so would most likely support FDR.

It is likely that even famers without lands would support FDR as they still benefitted from higher prices.

Urban workers were given the right to join unions, and support for higher wages so they would probably support FDR too.

Business owners on the other hand, might not support FDR due to his support for labor.

In conclusion, writing a letter for you would be academic dishonesty but these tips should help you out.

Find out more on the New Deal at brainly.com/question/936437.

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP ASAP dhdjdj fjdjdjffjfjdnd
babymother [125]

Answer:

A potential effect of this poster on the war effort is to inspire the children and women at home to work contribute to feeding the family, (working to get money).

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
What are 29 cfr parts 1915, 1917 and 1918 referred to as?
Nikitich [7]
<span>The 29 CFR parts 1915, 1917, and 1918 are referred to as maritime standards. These are simply regulations that have been put into place internationally for collisions and such for those who are traveling via the sea.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
When citizens have the power to decide how a country should operate it is known as __________
cluponka [151]

Answer:words

Explanation:yes

5 0
3 years ago
What "three beliefs" because the focus of the us foreign policy in the early 1900s
creativ13 [48]
If you want a answered should really go on quizlet.com and sign in.... it will really help you


^_Kookie^_
5 0
3 years ago
Why does Hitler want to control poland?​
liraira [26]

Answer: i found this on the internet. Hope it helps :)

Eight Reasons Hitler Invaded Poland

1.   To give Germans lebensraum in Eastern Europe

He had promised this in Mein Kampf (1924) and it was one of the three CENTRAL AIMS of Hitler foreign policy.

2.   Because he thought Chamberlain would not dare stop him

Chamberlain had stood up to Hitler, remember, at Bad Godesberg during the Sudeten crisis, but had then backed down at Munich.   Hitler despised Chamberlain, and did not believe that he would dare to go to war.   So he felt able to pursue his aims in Poland despite Chamberlain's promise in March 1939 to support Poland.

3.   To defend the Germans in Poland

The reason Hitler gave was that the Poles were persecuting those Germans who lived in Poland.   (There was some truth in this.)

4.   To overturn the Treaty of Versailles

This was a second CENTRAL AIM of Hitler's foreign policy.   The Polish Corridor and Posen had been given to Poland in 1919, and Danzig had been declared a free city administered by the League of Nations.   Hitler first asked Poland to consider the position of Danzig in October 1938, immediately after Munich, and in March 1939, Hitler demanded that he be given Danzig (this was the pattern he had followed with Austria and the Sudetenland).   Did you know that in March 1939 also, Germany seized the Lithuanian port of Memel (at the northern end of East Prussia)?   When Hitler demanded Danzig in March 1939, Brauchitsch, the Commander in Chief of the German Army noted that he intended ultimately to 'knock Poland down completely', and that eventually Hitler wanted Germany's pre-WWI boundary restoring.

5.   To oppose Communism/conquer Russia

I know Poland wasn't communist, but Russia was where Hitler was eventually headed (Mein Kampf, 1924) and Poland was just another step east.   When he demanded Danzig in 1939, Hitler's proposal included a joint anti-Soviet alliance against Russia.   This was the third CENTRAL AIM of Hitler foreign policy.

6.   To teach Chamberlain a lesson

Chamberlain's guarantee of Poland on 31 March 1939 infuriated Hitler - 'I'll cook them a stew they'll choke on' - was his reaction.   From then on he was determined to destroy Poland.  So you could say he wanted to attack Poland to teach Chamberlain a lesson.

7.   To prevent an anti-German alliance

Having thought about it, he realised also that the world was beginning to gang up on him, so the next day, 1 April, his CONSIDERED reaction was this: 'if they expect Germany to sit patiently by while they create satellite States and set them against Germany, then they are mistaken'.   This is fair enough, actually, because that is exactly what Chamberlain was trying to do.   And Poland was preparing to resist Hitler, and had started mobilising its army - Hitler stated that this broke Poland's non-aggression pact with Germany [see note below].   On April 3 Hitler issued a directive to his armies - entitled 'Case White' - stating that he wished to 'destroy Polish military strength and create in the East a situation which satisfies the requirements of national defence'.   In this document, he set the date for 'Case White' - 'any time from 1 September 1939 onward.' - and told the Werhmacht to draw up a timetable.

8.   The Nazi-Soviet Pact

After April 1939, both Roosevelt and Stalin began to express concerns about Hitler's aims on Poland.   Hitler merely mocked Roosevelt, but he was worried about Stalin.   Only Stalin - and the Russian army - could have stopped Hitler taking over Poland at this point.   But the failure of the Anglo-Soviet negotiations and the Nazi-Soviet Pact of 23 August 1939 not only freed up Hitler to attack Poland, it included a secret agreement to divide Poland up between them.   In the end, Hitler invaded Poland because he had agreed to do so with Stalin.

Explanation:

HOPE THIS HELPS! :D

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was Isabella d'este's family background and her position in Italian society
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following contributed to the start of civil wars and Mali's decline?
    11·2 answers
  • 4. States were still independent under the Articles.<br> (7.5 points)<br> True<br> False
    9·2 answers
  • Why were temperance and suffrage considered progressive?
    9·1 answer
  • roosevelt used the technology of radio to restore the nations confidence which president used the technology of television to do
    12·1 answer
  • Abcdefghijklmnop<br> Ok its long enough.<br> I need help with this question please
    9·2 answers
  • In your opinion, what was the most important change brought by the development of language? (2 things)​
    13·1 answer
  • How did NATO signal departure from traditional American foreign policy?​
    11·1 answer
  • The power given by the gods to the chinese rulers was called
    12·1 answer
  • THIS IS FOR SOCIOLOGY!!!! HELP PLZ
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!