The correct interpretation of this case is that antibiotic A is the only one that effectively fights the patient's bacteria.
<h3>How to interpret the results?</h3>
To interpret the results of this case, we must take into account the manifestations that occur with respect to the antibiotic samples A, B, C and D and their reaction with the bacteria in the patient's wound.
According to the above, it can be inferred that antibiotic A eliminated the bacteria, while the other three antibiotics allowed the proliferation of bacteria.
Learn more about antibiotics in: brainly.com/question/10868637
#SPJ1
Question : How to solve air pollution caused by incineration?
Answer : Have a machine nearby that sucks all the harmful air in and destroys it
Explanation:
Answer:
had passed a law which compelled the federal banks to pay tax to the state
Explanation:
Answer:
factor in creating demand for teachers than the growing enrollments. ... and 1975 to replace those who leave the profession. The number ...
The right to hear a case first.
Lower courts have the first opportunity for have a trial for a case which is the original jurisdiction. Higher courts are for appeals and hear cases if the verdict in the lower court is thought to be inaccurate because legal proceedings were not properly followed.