Rating peer performance has an impact on the person being assessed as well as you, the reviewer because it demonstrates an objective assessment that demonstrates maturity and professionalism.
The advantages of rating peer performance are related to broadening the team's perspective on the strengths and weaknesses of each employee, as well as:
- More detailed feedback
- Systematized view
- Cooperation
- Integration
- Responsibility
Therefore, evaluating peer performance can make teams stronger through a closer perspective on the team's needs, making the team more integrated and motivated.
Through effective assessment, the reviewer will also benefit from demonstrating professionalism and maturity.
Learn more about peer performance here:
brainly.com/question/9624547
Answer:
High Reinforcement value;high expectancy
Explanation:
In rotter's term, high reinforcement value refers to a reinforcement that occurs where the outcome of a certain situation is highly desirable.
Expectancy determined our belief on whether we could obtain that desirable outcome or not. People High expectancy tend to believe that they got what it takes to obtain that desirable outcome while people with low expectancy tend to be more pessimistic.
In the excerpt above, this part of the excerpt reveal that the situation has high reinforcement value:
<em>he wishes to realize his long-time dream of enrolling in medical school</em>
and this part of excerpt reveal that he has high expectancy for his own ability:
<em>He also believes that he is entirely capable of obtaining a perfect GPA if he devotes sufficient time to his schoolwork.</em>
<span>runs east of the Red River of the North, cuts through Lake Winnipeg theres also one more reason i just dont remember it if you really want to know the last reason il get out my geo book n search it up k just message or most comany known as comment on this answer and il gladly find out the other reason</span>
The executive branch of government
Answer:
I believe it's D.
Explanation:
I'm not completely sure....
