I think she will be ruled In all respects by me; nay, more, I doudt it not.
Answer:
The statement is OK.
Explanation:
Checking whether there is a case of plagiarism in an academic paper in the MLA format, the given statement is from one of the student samples provided alongside the passage.
The given passage/ statement mentions how Salman Rushdie finds the scene of The Wizard of Oz. This student sample of the text provides a given opinion of the famed writer, which may act as one of the sources of the academic research paper. And by indicating the quoted words with the (" ") symbol, there is no case of plagiarism. Rather, this is the correct way of stating a given line when quoted from another source. So, the given student sample is free from any plagiarism issues.
It's not likely you'll overdose on nicotine just from smoking cigarettes. Your body absorbs the nicotine in a cigarette around 1 milligram when you smoke it. Overdosing from nicotine gum or a patch is rare but it's possible if you don't follow the instructions carefully.
Answer:
The basis of this argument is that verbs are conjugated only in the present and past tense. If we want to refer to the future, we have to use the auxiliary verb will, or the be going to phrase followed by the verb in present or past, or the present tense. Since in English, there is no change in the conjugation of the verbs for the future, some linguistics claim that there are two tenses (past and present) while others claim that there are three because we form the future tense with the addition of the auxiliary or use present simple or continuous.
Explanation:
Linguistics such as Quicker Al claims that there are two tenses, present, and past since they are expressed by inflections in their verbs, while future does not have inflections. There is no future tense, but there is future time. Time is related to our perception of reality, making the future subjective. On the other side, tense expresses when an action happens, taking into account the moment that the person is speaking. Linguistics such as Hatav or Klein claims three tenses' existence, past, present, and future. They state that we can refer to the future with the addition of the auxiliary verb will, or the phrase be going to, or the use of present simple, or continuous even though there is no specific inflection in the verb, as it happens in other languages like Portuguese or Spanish. They identify the future with the definition of tense.
