<span>Assuming that this is referring to the same list of options that was posted before with this question, <span>the correct response would be "violent rioting" since this is not given to them as a power by the laws of the United States.</span></span>
C Medgar Evers let me know if i was right
Year 2000..... so 16 years before trump became president
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
Egypt. The population and their cultivated land was dependent of the nile river.