Answer:
a.
Explanation:
According to my research on different industry business plans, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the answer that does not describes the firm's situation would be that entrepreneurs outside the industry will be eager to enter. This is because it doesn't have anything to do with the business' situation and does not make sense since entrepreneurs that are not even part of this industry would be looking to form their own businesses.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Kindly check explanation
Explanation:
Given that :
Initial wealth = $1000
Cost of lottery = $5
Winning = $500
Number of players or tickets = 100
Only one winner can emerge :
P(winning) = 1/100
P(Not winning) = 1 - 1/100 = 99/100
P __ 1/100 _________ 99/100
X : [1000 + (500-5)] ___ (1000-5)
P(X): ____1/100 _______ 99/100
X : _____ 1495 _________995
Expected value E(x) :
E(X) = ΣX*p(x) = (1/100)*1495 + (99/100)*995 = 1000
C.)
Possible winning = $500 ; p(x) = 1/100
Possible loss = - 5 ;p(x) = 99/100
500 * (1/100) = 5
-5 * (99/100) = - 4.95
Σ(5 + - 4.95) = 5 - 4.95 = 0.05
Hence, gamble is favorable since 0.05 > 0
Hello! Sorry this is a little late.
I believe the correct answer to your question is $87.75.
I hope this helps, and have a great rest of your day!
Answer:
The total amount of assets is 15,750.
Explanation:
Reproducing the trial balance below for clarity:
Account Title Debit Credit
Cash 12,500
Accounts Receivable 3,250
Accounts Payable 2,800
Common Stock 6,600
Retained Earnings 4,500
Service Revenue 7,450
Operating Expenses 5,100
Dividends 500
Total 21,350 21,350
Calculation of Total Assets:
Total assets = Cash + Accounts Receivable
= 12,500 + 3,250
= 15,750
Note that among the given accounts, accounts cash and accounts receivable are assets; accounts payable is a liability; common stock and retained earnings are part of the capital; service revenue is a form of revenue; while operating expenses and dividends are expenses.
Answer:
The answer is:
The Kincaids can sue David and Sandra Dess because they can be considered intended beneficiaries of the contract between them and Sirva.
Explanation:
Intended beneficiaries are third parties in a contract that can sue the promisor for breach of contract.
In the contract, David and Sandra agreed to fully disclose all information about the property. Under the terms of the contract, they agreed that Sirva and "other prospective buyers" could rely on their disclosures.
