<h3>
Answer:</h3>
A. It practiced ruthless business techniques.
C. It dominated the oil market.
D. It controlled the transportation of oil.
<h3>
Explanation:</h3>
Standard Oil managed the oil goods market originally through smooth combination in the refining area, then, in later years upward combination; the organization was an innovator in the advancement of the industry business. The Standard Oil trust streamlined generation and logistics reduced values, and undermine opponents. "Trust-busting" experts prosecuted Standard Oil of practicing offensive pricing to crush opponents and form a merger that warned other industries.
President , government , congress
Well....
1.George Rodgers Clark captured the west from the British
2.Nathan Hale gave his life for his country
3. Benedict Arnold
4.John Paul Jones (Later nicknamed"Davy Jones") Defeated the British Navy
5.Colonel Hamilton was British commander at Vincennes
This question seems to be incomplete. However, there´s enough information to find the right answer.
I understand that this flag has serious important meanings . . . But that does not mean that . . . people may not under the First Amendment show their feelings by what Texas calls desecration of a venerated object. I think it's a most important case. I sense that it goes to the heart of the First Amendment, to hear things or to see things that we hate test the First Amendment more than seeing or hearing things that we like. It wasn't designed for things we like. They never needed a First Amendment.
—William M. Kunstler, Attorney for Gregory Lee Johnson, Texas v. Johnson
Use the drop-down menu to complete the sentence.
In this excerpt, attorney William Kunstler is arguing against his client's conviction.
The main idea of this excerpt is that the First Amendment is essential because it
Answer: allows for symbolic speech
Explanation:
After Gregory Lee Johnson, William Kunstler´s client, was tried and convicted for having burned an American flag to protest against Reagan´s government, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction and the case was sent to the Supreme Court. The Texas v. Johnson court case brought up the question of whether or not the desecration of an American flag is a form of speech protected under the First Amendment. The court ruled that Johnson burning the flag was a form of expression with a distinctively political nature and was protected by the First Amendment.
