That statement is false.
Different type of authorities could defintiely yield a different outcome.
for example, let's observe abraham lincoln and Adolf Hitler.
Both have the highest authority in their perspective nations and yet one of them created a society where human beings are considered to have a same dignitity while the other gassed a certain ethnic groups to death.
Answer: B. Suggestibility
Explanation: According to the statement in the question, Alex saw a girl in a red shirt stealing a candy bar. When asked by police what candy bar was stolen by the girl in the blue shirt, Alex accepts that it is a girl in a blue shirt. It is the result of suggestibility, and that is the tendency to accept according to the suggestions of others. In general, the information Alex gave is credible because it is a girl who stole a candy bar, but some part of the information is false, that part of the information that appears as a gap in memory for various reasons. These gaps in memory can occur as a result of the excitement or authority of a police uniform, and are usually filled with false information as a product of suggestibility.
This is an important reminder of the critical thinking concept of "<span>replicability".
</span>
Scientific studies should be replicable, implying that an investigation should deliver similar outcomes if rehashed precisely. Replicability can be expanded by doing top to bottom research on other similiar trials and discounting factors you might not have thought of initially.
Pass ex post facto laws that outlaw acts after they have already been committed.
Could it possibly be transformational?
