1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikklg [1K]
2 years ago
15

Linear Algebra question! Please help!

Mathematics
1 answer:
kozerog [31]2 years ago
5 0

Answers:

  1. false
  2. false
  3. true
  4. false
  5. True

==================================================

Explanation:

Problem 1

This is false because the A and B should swap places. It should be (AB)^{-1} = B^{-1}A^{-1}.

The short proof is to multiply AB with its inverse (AB)^{-1}  and we get: (AB)*(AB)^{-1} = (AB)*(B^{-1}A^{-1}) = A(B*B^{-1})*A^{-1} = A*A^{-1} = I

The fact we get the identity matrix proves that we have the proper order at this point. The swap happens so that B matches up its corresponding inverse B^{-1} and the two cancel each other out.

Keep in mind matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. So AB is not the same as BA.

-------------------------

Problem 2

This statement is true if and only if AB = BA

(A+B)^2 = (A+B)(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A(A+B) + B(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + AB + BA + B^2

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + 2AB + B^2 ... only works if AB = BA

However, in most general settings, matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. The order is important when multiplying most two matrices. Only for special circumstances is when AB = BA going to happen. In general,  AB = BA is false which is why statement two breaks down and is false in general.

-------------------------

Problem 3

This statement is true.

If A and B are invertible, then so is AB.

This is because both A^{-1} and B^{-1} are known to exist (otherwise A and B wouldn't be invertible) and we can use the rule mentioned in problem 1. Make sure to swap the terms of course.

Or you can use a determinant argument to prove the claim

det(A*B) = det(A)*det(B)

Since A and B are invertible, their determinants det(A) and det(B) are nonzero which makes the right hand side nonzero. Therefore det(A*B) is nonzero and AB has an inverse.

So if we have two invertible matrices, then their product is also invertible. This idea can be scaled up to include things like A^4*B^3 being also invertible.

If you wanted, you can carefully go through it like this:

  1. If A and B are invertible, then so is AB
  2. If A and AB are invertible, then so is A*AB = A^2B
  3. If A and A^2B are invertible, then so is A*A^2B = A^3B

and so on until you build up to A^4*B^3. Therefore, we can conclude that A^m*B^n is also invertible. Be careful about the order of multiplying the matrices. Something like A*AB is different from AB*A, the first of which is useful while the second is not.

So this is why statement 3 is true.

-------------------------

Problem 4

This is false. Possibly a quick counter-example is to consider these two matrices

A = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{bmatrix} \text{ and } B = \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 0\\0 & -1\end{bmatrix}

both of which are invertible since their determinant is nonzero (recall the determinant of a diagonal matrix is simply the product along the diagonal entries). So it's not too hard to show that the determinant of each is 1, and each matrix shown is invertible.

However, adding those two mentioned matrices gets us the 2x2 zero matrix, which is a matrix of nothing but zeros. Clearly the zero matrix has determinant zero and is therefore not invertible.

There are some cases when A+B may be invertible, but it's not true in general.

-------------------------

Problem 5

This is true because each A pairs up with an A^{-1} to cancel out (similar what happened with problem 1). For more info, check out the concept of diagonalization.

You might be interested in
HELP QUICK JUST ANSWER NO EXPLANATION
postnew [5]

Answer:

your cheating on your test but ok d and I need brainliest answer

8 0
3 years ago
Guess the rule and add the next number in the sequence.<br> 6, 8, 12, 18, 26,
brilliants [131]

Answer:

The rule: Adds twice as much as the previous number added

Next number: 38

Step-by-step explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
(1) Logan has 6 pounds of paste. Each time he makes dinner he uses 34 pound of
kaheart [24]

SHDHSB SSHD EUDXD EJDJXJEX SJDJWIDIJDWN SSHWIJJSJ

Step-by-step explanation:

XJDUXIDB DUDUU

3 0
3 years ago
Pam kept track of the puppies available for adoption at the shelter. after 2 hours, there were 10 puppies available for adoption
Sav [38]
2d hour- 10 puppies
3rd hour- 8 puppies
4th hour- 6 puppies
5th hour- 4 puppies
6th hour- 2 puppies
6 0
4 years ago
What's the solution to he inequality ?
Dovator [93]
The correct answer is B x > -3 cause we are solving for x! Hope this helps! :D
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP I USED ALL MY POINTS
    15·2 answers
  • What is the place value of the 5 in 59.085
    15·1 answer
  • Jana is thinking of a number. If she divides her number by 12 and then multiplies the quotient by 8,the result is 520. What numb
    9·1 answer
  • I need help ASAP!
    14·1 answer
  • 2x - 3y --24<br> x + 6y = 18<br> Substitution
    5·1 answer
  • Question 4 (1 point)<br> (-7x + 5) - (-82 – 6) =
    12·1 answer
  • Can anyone help me pls
    7·1 answer
  • 25. SKETCHING Draw three noncollinear points J, K, and L.
    11·1 answer
  • Penny has some money. After
    14·1 answer
  • Vada places a box of toys and a box of books together. The box of toys has a length of 5 feet, a width of 3 feet, and a height o
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!