1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nikklg [1K]
2 years ago
15

Linear Algebra question! Please help!

Mathematics
1 answer:
kozerog [31]2 years ago
5 0

Answers:

  1. false
  2. false
  3. true
  4. false
  5. True

==================================================

Explanation:

Problem 1

This is false because the A and B should swap places. It should be (AB)^{-1} = B^{-1}A^{-1}.

The short proof is to multiply AB with its inverse (AB)^{-1}  and we get: (AB)*(AB)^{-1} = (AB)*(B^{-1}A^{-1}) = A(B*B^{-1})*A^{-1} = A*A^{-1} = I

The fact we get the identity matrix proves that we have the proper order at this point. The swap happens so that B matches up its corresponding inverse B^{-1} and the two cancel each other out.

Keep in mind matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. So AB is not the same as BA.

-------------------------

Problem 2

This statement is true if and only if AB = BA

(A+B)^2 = (A+B)(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A(A+B) + B(A+B)

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + AB + BA + B^2

(A+B)^2 = A^2 + 2AB + B^2 ... only works if AB = BA

However, in most general settings, matrix multiplication is <u>not</u> commutative. The order is important when multiplying most two matrices. Only for special circumstances is when AB = BA going to happen. In general,  AB = BA is false which is why statement two breaks down and is false in general.

-------------------------

Problem 3

This statement is true.

If A and B are invertible, then so is AB.

This is because both A^{-1} and B^{-1} are known to exist (otherwise A and B wouldn't be invertible) and we can use the rule mentioned in problem 1. Make sure to swap the terms of course.

Or you can use a determinant argument to prove the claim

det(A*B) = det(A)*det(B)

Since A and B are invertible, their determinants det(A) and det(B) are nonzero which makes the right hand side nonzero. Therefore det(A*B) is nonzero and AB has an inverse.

So if we have two invertible matrices, then their product is also invertible. This idea can be scaled up to include things like A^4*B^3 being also invertible.

If you wanted, you can carefully go through it like this:

  1. If A and B are invertible, then so is AB
  2. If A and AB are invertible, then so is A*AB = A^2B
  3. If A and A^2B are invertible, then so is A*A^2B = A^3B

and so on until you build up to A^4*B^3. Therefore, we can conclude that A^m*B^n is also invertible. Be careful about the order of multiplying the matrices. Something like A*AB is different from AB*A, the first of which is useful while the second is not.

So this is why statement 3 is true.

-------------------------

Problem 4

This is false. Possibly a quick counter-example is to consider these two matrices

A = \begin{bmatrix}1 & 0\\0 & 1\end{bmatrix} \text{ and } B = \begin{bmatrix}-1 & 0\\0 & -1\end{bmatrix}

both of which are invertible since their determinant is nonzero (recall the determinant of a diagonal matrix is simply the product along the diagonal entries). So it's not too hard to show that the determinant of each is 1, and each matrix shown is invertible.

However, adding those two mentioned matrices gets us the 2x2 zero matrix, which is a matrix of nothing but zeros. Clearly the zero matrix has determinant zero and is therefore not invertible.

There are some cases when A+B may be invertible, but it's not true in general.

-------------------------

Problem 5

This is true because each A pairs up with an A^{-1} to cancel out (similar what happened with problem 1). For more info, check out the concept of diagonalization.

You might be interested in
Please answer correctly and no links​
krek1111 [17]

Answer:

-6.825 (-2 33/40). hope this helps

Step-by-step explanation:

- Zombie

4 0
3 years ago
Niko spent $23.25 a raffle ticket that cost $.75 each which of the following is the number of raffle tickets nickel bought
miskamm [114]

Answer:

31 raffle tickets

Step-by-step explanation:

23.25 divided by 0.75 = 31

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
5 3/16" into millimeters
Anit [1.1K]
131.7625 would be your answer here
5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
There are 19 boxes of cherries. This is 5 less than twice the number of boxes of kiwis. How many boxes of kiwis are there?
sasho [114]
All you have to do is 19+5 because it is 5 less. 19 is 5 less than the kiwis. so 19+5= 24.  


There is 24 boxes of kiwis
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which is the answer ? Please help
klasskru [66]
It’s C one while if her assignment
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Is 3 hours and 30 minutes more or less than 20% of a day?
    12·1 answer
  • Gretchen withdrew $31.45 from the bank to buy groceries. Then she deposited a check for $27.89 in the bank. Which expression rep
    15·2 answers
  • Solve for x: −4|x + 5| = −16
    13·1 answer
  • According to the Rational Root Theorem, which function has the same set of potential rational roots as the function g(x) = 3x^5
    15·1 answer
  • Hey everyone I’m struggling with this can you help?
    7·1 answer
  • What digit 0-9 does not appear in the first 30 digits of pi
    11·1 answer
  • Can someone help me on these?
    12·2 answers
  • The velocity of a particle can be modeled by the function V(t)=1/10(3t-8)^3+2. Which graph accurately shows the velocity of
    10·1 answer
  • Talil is going to make some concrete mix.
    5·1 answer
  • When finding the area of a circle if you are given the diameter how will you solve to find the radius
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!