1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
motikmotik
3 years ago
10

Is Rome civilianisation better or the Viking’s?

History
2 answers:
Harlamova29_29 [7]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Both were strong at their peaks, but seeing how the vikings were much more used to the sea life and raiding, and how the peak of roman military was extremely focused on conquests, i would say the romans would beat them. But in a water battle, vikings probably take the cake.

hope it helps you

defon3 years ago
3 0
This a matter of opinion ,in retrospect I think the Romans were better because they were more advanced and were extremely intelligent.They had many strategy’s while the Vikings were more of a “Kill now, solve later” type of people.In a standoff between the 2 ,I reckon the Romans would win,in many battle they were outnumbered but still won by sticking together.In a battle again Boudicca and here 100,000 troops versus The Romans 10,000 the Romans won.
You might be interested in
What were the philosophical roots of the Declaration of Independence and what effect did the Declaration have on the struggle?
Nat2105 [25]
The philosophical roots of the Declaration of Independence came from Enlightenment thinkers such as John Locke, who argued that the government should serve the people and be chosen by the people. The effect of the Declaration was that the colonies officially separated from Britain. 
5 0
3 years ago
Select the correct answer.
Black_prince [1.1K]

there are no mutiple choices

3 0
3 years ago
When and where was the treaty between the Big Four and Germany signed?
qaws [65]

Answer:

Hall of Mirrors in France on June 28, 1919

6 0
3 years ago
Which trend in Romanticism aided by political revolutions featured a preoccupation with distant lands and cultures?
Fantom [35]
The correct answer would be : Nationalism

Nationalism is a form dignified love towards one's nation or country, which make that person willing to do anything necessary in order to bring Glories to their own country, including preoccupation with distant Lands and also their cultures
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why didn't the US annex Cuba after the Spanish American War?
gayaneshka [121]

Answer:

The reason why the US did not annex Cuba was because people with money did not want to. Henry Teller, senator from Colorado, lobbied to pass the Teller Amendment which explicitly stated that the US, and President McKinley should not annex Cuba under any circumstances.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe Meriwether Lewis
    9·1 answer
  • The intersection of math and religion led to what in Egypt?
    14·1 answer
  • Why Did The Crusades Begin?
    8·2 answers
  • Paul Robeson believed whites would see african americans as equals if white's understood african american
    6·1 answer
  • Which bests describes the roles of the catwaba women and men
    5·1 answer
  • Ronald is serving a sentence of five years in prison for a crime he committed. He is using his time in prison to take advantage
    7·2 answers
  • A Whole New World
    14·1 answer
  • Which three geographical advantages did the Roman historian Livy see in Rome's location? The caves in the surrounding mountains
    8·1 answer
  • How would this impact the world moving forward, knowing that atomic bombs are a real threat? Explain in 3 sentences pls!
    10·1 answer
  • One of the first theorists to emphasize a cognitive contribution to depression was:____.
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!