Is Rome civilianisation better or the Viking’s?

History

2 answers:

Harlamova29_29 [7]2 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Both were strong at their peaks, but seeing how the vikings were much more used to the sea life and raiding, and how the peak of roman military was extremely focused on conquests, i would say the romans would beat them. But in a water battle, vikings probably take the cake.

hope it helps you

defon2 years ago

3 0

This a matter of opinion ,in retrospect I think the Romans were better because they were more advanced and were extremely intelligent.They had many strategy’s while the Vikings were more of a “Kill now, solve later” type of people.In a standoff between the 2 ,I reckon the Romans would win,in many battle they were outnumbered but still won by sticking together.In a battle again Boudicca and here 100,000 troops versus The Romans 10,000 the Romans won.

You might be interested in

Describe the demographic trend of the united states during the early 1940s?

Alex73 [517]

Answer:

To outline racial and ethnic groups, demographers depended on the U.S. decennial census and annual Current Population Surveys (CPS). To calculate marriage, fertility, and mortality rates, demographers use the national vital statistics records of births, marriages, and deaths. Estimates of internal migration come from the U.S. Bureau of the Census (USBC), and estimates of international migration come from the Immigration and Naturalization Services and USBC.

Explanation:

Population size is determined by three principal metrics of demography: mortality, fertility, and migration. Racial and ethnic differences in rates of one or more of these metrics cause the racial composition of the nation to change. Recently, international migration and higher fertility rates among some racial and ethnic groups have been the sole contributors to the nation’s population growth and changing composition.

Historical Trends

The racial and ethnic composition of the more than 265 million U.S. residents is 1 percent American Indian, 3 percent Asian, 11 percent Hispanic, 12 percent Black, and 73 percent White (Deardorff and Hollmann, 1997)—quite different than it was 50 years ago, and projected to be different 50 years from now.

6 0

3 years ago

What was a major component of the Schlieffen Plan

aksik [14]

The Schlieffen Plan was created in World War 1. It was used by the Germans to in order to fight France and Russia in the war. Germany was one of the central powers and was therefore in the "middle" of France and Russia. Russia was allied with France, so once a country declared war on France, the Russian army had to pitch in and help them fight.

Furthermore, the Germans declared war on France and Russia was ready to mobilize.

While Russia was mobilizing, the Germans wanted to fight one front at once quickly, so they could then fight Russia. They had to march through neutral Belgium and encircle the French army.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

During ww1 , tanks were used on the western front primarily to ?

Nostrana [21]

They were used to increase mobility

7 0

3 years ago

Use your notes from the lesson to complete the French Revolution Analysis Chart and Reflection. You will include: at least two c

Alex

The answer is The enlightenment led to serious mess ups and had very serious causes but therefore on the other hand, there was many good things about the enlightenment

4 0

4 years ago

What happened to the Federalists after the War of 1812?

Zinaida [17]

The correct answer is B: They were mocked as defeatists and traitors.

With the signing of the Treaty of Ghent in 1814 and the end of the War of 1812, many Americans viewed the Federalists as traitors. The Federalist Party collapsed , leaving the Democratic-Republican Party as the only political party in the USA until the mid- 1820s.

3 0

3 years ago