I haven't done these in about 5 years so please forgive me if they're wrong.
I also bolded the part that is supposed to be circled.
1. is the story
2. to the Citizens' Stamp Advisory Committee & for a new stamp
3. of this committee & are artists, stamp collectors, and business persons
4. for the new design & by the committee
5. to the postmaster general
6. without the approval & of these two parties
7. in the process & of an artist
8. to an artist & from the Bureau of Engraving and Printing
9. of the stamp
10. for the United States of America & of the stamp & about the stamp
I hope that helped you better understand :)
sarcastic because they're saying something bad helped them do something good
Answer:
<em>That no animals were born in the wild </em>
Explanation:
tbh i looked it up lol
Answer:
The answer is B, current copyright dates.
Explanation:
A persuasive argument has nothing to do with how reliable a source is. Well-written opinions are just opinions, which are not facts that you can rely on. Professional photos can be taken by anyone. Current copyright dates at least tell you that the info is NOT outdated.
B. Envision i just had the same question and it was correct
