Answer:
American settlers were taught by Native americans how to trade and how to farm crops. American settlers later took the land away from Native Americans and out them on reservations
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
The existence of many and conflicting moral viewpoints means that, logically, there are no answers to moral questions but the individual has to develop their own moral concepts that are going to be applied when it decides on an ethical issue.
Ethics studies the moral acts of human beings. Morals study the decisions that stem from the conscience. So there is no logic or reasoning because every individual has its set of moral rules or standards, depending on its culture, race, ethnicity, values, or traditions. So when the individual is about to make a decision, he or she is aware that there is going to be consequences from that decision and the individual has to live by those consequences.
Answer:
We hoped that the restaurant manager would sponsor our baseball team.
Explanation:
The strategies of the Union and Confederacy differ during the Civil War as the Union beloved in a unitary country that was free from slavery.
<h3>How to explain the information?</h3>
After the Emancipation Proclamation of 1863, the Union's basic purpose of unification was revised to include the abolition of slavery. Throughout the entire conflict, the Confederacy's main objectives were to incorporate all slave states, secede from the Union, endure, and protect its territory.
The Anaconda Plan aimed to totally encircle the Southern region, blockade the Atlantic Ocean, and take control of the Mississippi, obstructing trade with the area and compelling the residents of the region to capitulate.
Therefore, the strategies of the Union and Confederacy differ during the Civil War as the Union beloved in a unitary country that was free from slavery.
Learn more about Confederacy on:
brainly.com/question/951920
#SPJ1
The Pentagon Papers "revealed that government officials had misled Congress and the American people about the war," since it was argued that President Johnson knew far more about the detailed horrors and failed strategies of the war than he let on.
