Due to the need to have completely controlled experiments to test a hypothesis, science can not prove everything. For example, the scientific method cannot alone say that global warming is bad or harmful to the world, as it can only study the objective causes and consequences.
Answer:
The North American fur trade was an industry and activity related to the acquisition, trade, exchange, and sale of animal furs in North America. Aboriginal peoples in Canada and Native Americans in the United States of various regions traded among themselves in the pre–Columbian Era. Europeans participated in the trade from the time of their arrival in the New World, extending the trade's reach to Europe. The French started trading in the 16th century, the English established trading posts on Hudson Bay in present-day Canada during the 17th century, while the Dutch had trade by the same time in New Netherland. North American fur trade was at its peak of economic importance in the 19th century, and involved the development of elaborate trade networks.
The fur trade became one of the main economic ventures in North America attracting competition among the French, British, Dutch, Spanish, and Russians. Indeed, in the early history of the United States, capitalizing on this trade, and removing the British stranglehold over it, was seen as a major economic objective. Many Native American societies across the continent came to depend on the fur trade as their primary source of income. By the mid-1800s changing fashions in Europe brought about a collapse in fur prices. The American Fur Company and some other companies failed. Many Native communities were plunged into long-term poverty and consequently lost much of the political influence they once had.
Explanation:
Explanation:
Many violent volcanoes spew a lot of pyroclasts and gases such as carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide high into the atmosphere. The fine pyroclast would linger in the atmosphere for months and even years blocking out the sun. This would cause vegetation to die out and decrease. Photosynthetic organisms re usual producers and the entry point of energy from the sun into ecosystems. Their death would mean the collapse of ecosystems.
Settling pyroclast would also blanket vegetation in thick layers hence also denying them access to sunlight. There would be a definite drastic decline in population and communities and ecosystems, and even extinction akin to the extinction even to the dinosaurs during the meteorite strike.
Learn More:
Check out a similarity with the extinction of dinosaurs;
brainly.com/question/12934291
brainly.com/question/10980466
#LearnWithBrainly
