Answer:
4. 21
5. 32
Step-by-step explanation:
First question:
sin(x) = opp/hyp = 22/63 = 0.3492
x = sin⁻¹(0.3492)
20.43. Rounded to the nearest degree, it would be 21.
Second question:
sin(x) = opp/hyp = 18/34 = 0.5294
x = sin⁻¹(0.5294)
31.96. Rounded to the nearest degree, it would be 32.
Let me know if you have any problems.
Answer:
Conclusion
There is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The population mean for EBR is 
The sample mean for Ascension parish is 
The p-value is 
The level of significance is 
The null hypothesis is 
The alternative hypothesis is 
Here 
is the population mean for Ascension parish
From the data given values we see that
So we fail to reject the null hypothesis
So we conclude that there is no sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean of the home prices from Ascension parish is higher than the EBR mean
Answer:
One-third
Step-by-step explanation:
One-third (which is about 33.3%) is greater than 25%
Answer:
47.8°
Step-by-step explanation:
Let's first outline the important parameters
--- <V = 90°
Vt = 64
UV = 43
The angles in a triangle sums up to 180,but we don't have up to 2 angles given so as to find the third one. What we have to is to find the second angle,in this case T,using the sine rule.
Sin v/v = sin t/t
(Sin 90)/64 = sin t/43
Cross multiply and we have
43 sin 90 = 64 sin t
Sin t = 43 sin 90 ÷ 64
Sin t = 0.6719
Sine inverse of t = 42.2°(the second angle)
Angle U = 180 -( 90 + 42.2)
180 - 132.2
= 47.8°
36/2=18
18 would be your answer the radius is half of the diameter
