Answer:
There should be a comma after the 3
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Pls Mark As brainliest need to rank up
Answer:
By the end of the novel, nick leaves the east for the midwest because he views the midwest as a place of traditional values and attention to morality.
Explanation:
Nick Carraway is the narrator in the novel "The Great Gatsby" by F. Scott Fitzgerald. By the end of the story, he returns to the midwest, leaving the east after going through a great deal. While living close to New York and after mingling with the high society from that time, Nick has seen it all. All types of sins, criminals accusing criminals, betrayers pointing fingers at betrayers. He has seen a world of vapid people whose only purpose is to party their troubles away. They drink, dance, gossip, have affairs, and despise one another, all in an effort to forget their own faults, their own sadness. After the main character, Gatsby, is killed as a result of a provoked misunderstanding, Nick has had enough. He's done with the hypocrisy of the wealthy. He goes back to a place of traditional values and attention to morality.
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>
