Answer: The object of the preposition by means of is "protest".
Explanation:<u> The object of the preposition is a noun or a pronoun that completes a prepositional phrase</u> which has been introduced by a preposition. Most times, this noun or pronoun is found to the right of the preposition. Moreover, in some cases, a gerund can also function as object of the preposition, In the sentence provided,<u> the object of the proposition is a noun ("protest") and it is found to the right of "by means of". </u>
Under a unified government, people are deprived of their freedom. United where two groups were formed, the federalists and the anti-federalists.
In 1787, there was a dispute in the United States, where two groups of federalists and anti-Federalists were formed.
Federalists were those who fought for the effectiveness of the last constitutional amendment. Instead, they fought anti-Federalists to prevent these changes from being made.
The group that voted in favour of the constitutional amendment believed that a single government would have more control over the people and businesses they were interested in. Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a centralized government would result in the loss of people's freedom, which they believed was an act of oppression of their citizens.
Learn more about government here: brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ4
Answer + Explanation:
As the society grows more and more health conscious, stronger voices to ban smoking in all public areas begin to emerge. Banning public has been used as a mean for government to discourage smoking and also to improve city image. It is almost impossible to achieve consensus on this issue as it creates great inconvenience for the smokers. However, I believe smoking should be banned in public places and my reasons are as follow.
Looking at the <em>health aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because it is not only a health hazard for the smoker, it creates more harm to the others. Cigarette is a known carcinogen that has been associated with increased rates of lung cancer and heart disease. However, the hazard does not end there, second-hand smoke has been proven to create more detrimental effects on health on both the smokers and the people around them. This is especially harmful for those with weaker immune systems such as children and elderly.
Looking at the <em>sociological aspect</em>, smoking should be banned in public places because smoking is a personal choice. One’s personal enjoyment should not be at the expense of others’ health. When a person smokes in indoor public areas such as restaurants and shopping centres, pollutants continue to circulate the premise and affecting the health of everyone within the building. It is unfair for the non-smokers to be forced to share the health risks of the smokers.
To sum up, public places are shared by all, smokers and non-smokers, old and young, and should be made friendly to all. <u>Negative effects of smoking go beyond the smoker himself, creating health problems of the public.</u> While some choose to accept the side effects of smoking, risks of smoking should not be forced upon others. Therefore, in my humble opinions, smoking should be banned in public places.
Juices and flavors are soaked up by the injera
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello friend!!!!!
Anne wanted to keep a diary because she did not have a real friend
Hope this helps
plz mark as brainliest!!!!!!!!
